Rajan Dheeraj K, Clark Timothy W I, Patel Nikunj K, Stavropoulos S William, Simons Martin E
Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network-University of Toronto, 399 Bathurst Street, Toronto, Ontario M5T 2S8, Canada.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003 May;14(5):567-73. doi: 10.1097/01.rvi.0000071090.76348.bc.
Cephalic arch stenosis (CAS) is a recently recognized cause of dysfunction in autogenous hemodialysis fistulas. The prevalence of this lesion among dysfunctional autogenous fistulas is described, as are outcomes after percutaneous therapy.
A cohort of 177 dysfunctional autogenous fistulas treated over a 48-month period was retrospectively analyzed for the presence of CAS. Of these, 116 (66%) were radiocephalic fistulas and 61 (34%) were brachiocephalic fistulas. CAS was identified in 26 fistulas among 24 patients. Fifty dilations and three stent placements in the cephalic arch were performed. Surveillance was conducted after percutaneous therapy by means of ultrasound dilution technique and measurement of dialysis flow rates. Patency rates were estimated with use of the Kaplan-Meier method. No patients were lost to follow-up.
The prevalence of CAS was 15% (26 of 177). There was a significant difference in the prevalence of CAS between brachiocephalic and radiocephalic fistulas (39% vs 2%; P <.001). High-pressure noncompliant balloon catheters were required in 29 of 50 dilations (58%) to efface the lesion. Primary patency rates (+/-SE) at 3, 6, and 12 months were 76% +/- 8, 42% +/- 10, and 23% +/- 9, respectively. Primary assisted patency rates (+/-SE) at 3, 6, and 12 months were 96% +/- 4, 83% +/- 8, and 75% +/- 10. Complications occurred in three cases (6%). A major complication with rupture of the cephalic arch resulted in thrombosis and fistula loss (n = 1); two minor complications of cephalic arch rupture were salvaged with placement of a Wallstent (n = 1) or prolonged balloon inflation (n = 1).
CAS is common among failing brachiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas. With aggressive percutaneous intervention and surveillance, favorable primary assisted patency rates can be achieved.
头臂干狭窄(CAS)是自体动静脉内瘘功能障碍的一种新发现病因。本文描述了该病变在功能障碍的自体动静脉内瘘中的患病率,以及经皮治疗后的结果。
回顾性分析了在48个月期间接受治疗的177例功能障碍的自体动静脉内瘘患者,以确定是否存在CAS。其中,116例(66%)为桡动脉-头静脉内瘘,61例(34%)为肱动脉-头静脉内瘘。24例患者的26个内瘘发现有CAS。对头臂干进行了50次扩张和3次支架置入。经皮治疗后,通过超声稀释技术和透析血流量测量进行监测。使用Kaplan-Meier方法估计通畅率。无患者失访。
CAS的患病率为15%(177例中的26例)。肱动脉-头静脉内瘘和桡动脉-头静脉内瘘的CAS患病率存在显著差异(39%对2%;P<.001)。50次扩张中有29次(58%)需要使用高压非顺应性球囊导管来消除病变。3、6和12个月时的初始通畅率(±标准误)分别为76%±8、42%±10和23%±9。3、6和12个月时的初始辅助通畅率(±标准误)分别为96%±4、83%±8和75%±10。3例(6%)发生并发症。1例主要并发症为头臂干破裂导致血栓形成和内瘘失功;2例头臂干破裂的轻微并发症通过置入Wallstent(1例)或延长球囊扩张时间(1例)得以挽救。
CAS在失败的肱动脉-头静脉动静脉内瘘中很常见。通过积极的经皮干预和监测,可以获得良好的初始辅助通畅率。