Vandenplas O, Malo J L
Service de Pneumologie, Cliniques de Mont-Godinne, Université Catholique de Louvain, Yvoir, Belgium.
Eur Respir J. 2003 Apr;21(4):706-12. doi: 10.1183/09031936.03.00113303.
The workplace can trigger or induce asthma and cause the onset of different types of work-related asthma. Analysis of previous definitions of occupational asthma (OA) led to the conclusion that evidence of a direct causal relationship between workplace exposure and the development of asthma remains the key element for defining OA. Based on clinical features and pathophysiological mechanisms, the following conditions should be distinguished in the spectrum of work-related asthma: 1) immunological OA characterised by a latency period necessary to acquire immunologically induced sensitisation; 2) nonimmunological OA characterised by the rapid onset of asthma following single or multiple exposures to high concentrations of irritant compounds; 3) work-related asthma defined by exacerbation of symptoms in workers with pre-existing or coincident asthma; and 4) variant syndromes including eosinophilic bronchitis, potroom asthma, and asthma-like disorders caused by organic dusts. The issues and controversies relating to this approach are critically reviewed in order to stimulate the consensus development of operational definitions of work-related asthma.
工作场所可引发或诱发哮喘,并导致不同类型的职业性哮喘发作。对以往职业性哮喘(OA)定义的分析得出结论,工作场所暴露与哮喘发病之间存在直接因果关系的证据仍然是定义OA的关键要素。根据临床特征和病理生理机制,在职业性哮喘范围内应区分以下情况:1)免疫性OA,其特征为获得免疫诱导的致敏作用需要一段潜伏期;2)非免疫性OA,其特征为单次或多次接触高浓度刺激性化合物后哮喘迅速发作;3)由已存在或同时存在的哮喘患者症状加重所定义的职业性哮喘;4)变异综合征,包括嗜酸性支气管炎、铝电解车间哮喘以及由有机粉尘引起的哮喘样疾病。对与该方法相关的问题和争议进行了批判性审查,以促进职业性哮喘操作定义的共识形成。