Augestad L B, Flanders W D
Department of Sport Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences and Technology Management, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Eat Weight Disord. 2003 Mar;8(1):12-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03324984.
The goals of this study were to evaluate how well the Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI) predicted specific eating disorders as identified by the Survey of Eating Disorders (SED), and to identify the most predictive EDI scales. An additional goal was to evaluate the EDI as a screening instrument for eating disorders among a large non-clinical group of women.
The community-based study sample consisted of 1245 Norwegian women between age 18 and 50 years (mean 23). Subjects filled out the EDI and the SED.
The strongest predictors of SED-defined eating disorders were the EDI scales bulimia (BN) and drive of thinness (DT) and body mass index (BMI). When we classified women with an EDI sum score of 40 or higher as having an eating disorder (ED), the sensitivity was 38% and the specificity was 90%, compared to the SED diagnosis of ED.
Our findings suggest modest agreement between the EDI and the SED, and modest sensitivity and specificity of the EDI. While these instruments, perhaps with some modification, may be adequate for use in selected research applications, they should probably be supplemented with additional information in a clinical or treatment setting.
本研究的目的是评估饮食失调量表(EDI)对饮食失调调查(SED)所确定的特定饮食失调的预测能力,并确定最具预测性的EDI量表。另一个目标是评估EDI作为一大群非临床女性饮食失调筛查工具的有效性。
基于社区的研究样本包括1245名年龄在18至50岁之间(平均23岁)的挪威女性。受试者填写了EDI和SED。
SED定义的饮食失调的最强预测因素是EDI量表中的暴食(BN)、追求瘦身驱力(DT)和体重指数(BMI)。当我们将EDI总分40分及以上的女性归类为患有饮食失调(ED)时,与SED对ED的诊断相比,敏感性为38%,特异性为90%。
我们的研究结果表明EDI和SED之间的一致性一般,且EDI的敏感性和特异性一般。虽然这些工具可能经过一些修改后适用于特定的研究应用,但在临床或治疗环境中可能需要补充额外信息。