Mourad A, Carney S, Gillies A, Jones B, Nanra R, Trevillian P
Department of Nephrology, John Hunter Hospital, Hunter Region Mail Centre, NSW, Australia.
J Hum Hypertens. 2003 Jun;17(6):389-95. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001563.
The objective of this study was to re-evaluate the effect of arm position on blood pressure (BP) measurement with auscultatory and oscillometric methods including ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). The setting was the hospital outpatient department and the subjects chosen were normotensive and hypertensive. The effect of lowering the arm from heart level on indirect systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) measurement as well as the importance of supporting the horizontal arm were measured. In the sitting position, lowering the supported horizontal arm to the dependent position increased BP measured by a mercury device from 103+/-10/60+/-7 to 111+/-14/67+/-10 mmHg in normotensive subjects, a mean increase of 8/7 mmHg (P<0.01). In hypertensive subjects, a similar manoeuvre increased BP from 143+/-21/78+/-17 to 166+/-29/88+/-20 mmHg, an increase of 23/10 mmHg (P<0.01). Combined results from normotensive and hypertensive subjects demonstrate a direct and proportional association between BP (SBP and DBP) and the increase produced by arm dependency. Similar changes and associations were noted with oscillometric devices in the clinic situation. However, supporting the horizontal arm did not alter BP. Of particular interest, analysis of 13 hypertensive subjects who underwent ABPM on two occasions, once with the arm in the 'usual' position and once with the arm held horizontally for BP measurement during waking hours, demonstrated changes comparable to the other devices. The mean 12-hour BP was 154+/-19/82+/-10 mmHg during the former period and significantly decreased to 141+/-18/74+/-9 mmHg during the latter period (P<0.01). Regression analysis of the change in SBP and DBP with arm position change again demonstrated a close correlation (r(2)=0.8113 and 0.7273; P<0.001) with the artefact being larger with higher systolic and diastolic pressures. In conclusion, arm movements lead to significant artefacts in BP measurement, which are greater, the higher the systolic or diastolic pressure. These systematic errors occur when using both auscultatory and oscillometric (clinic and ABPM) devices and might lead to an erroneous diagnosis of hypertension and unnecessary medication, particularly in individuals with high normal BP levels. Since clinical interpretations of heart level vary, the horizontal arm position should be the unambiguous standard for all sitting and standing BP auscultatory and oscillometric measurements.
本研究的目的是重新评估手臂位置对采用听诊法和示波法(包括动态血压监测,ABPM)测量血压(BP)的影响。研究地点为医院门诊部,选取的受试者为血压正常者和高血压患者。测量了将手臂从心脏水平降低对间接收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)测量的影响以及支撑水平手臂的重要性。在坐姿下,将支撑的水平手臂放至下垂位置,血压正常的受试者用汞柱式血压计测量的血压从103±10/60±7 mmHg升至111±14/67±10 mmHg,平均升高8/7 mmHg(P<0.01)。在高血压受试者中,类似的操作使血压从143±21/78±17 mmHg升至166±29/88±20 mmHg,升高23/10 mmHg(P<0.01)。血压正常和高血压受试者的综合结果表明,血压(SBP和DBP)与手臂下垂所产生的升高之间存在直接且成比例的关联。在临床情况下,使用示波装置也观察到了类似的变化和关联。然而,支撑水平手臂并不会改变血压。特别值得注意的是,对13名高血压受试者进行了两次ABPM,一次手臂处于“通常”位置,一次在清醒时将手臂水平放置以测量血压,结果显示变化与其他装置类似。前一阶段的平均12小时血压为154±19/82±10 mmHg,后一阶段显著降至141±18/74±9 mmHg(P<0.01)。SBP和DBP随手臂位置变化的回归分析再次表明存在密切相关性(r² = 0.8113和0.7273;P<0.001),且收缩压和舒张压越高,人为误差越大。总之,手臂移动会导致血压测量中出现显著的人为误差,收缩压或舒张压越高,误差越大。使用听诊法和示波法(临床测量和ABPM)装置时都会出现这些系统误差,可能导致高血压的错误诊断和不必要的药物治疗,尤其是在血压略高于正常水平的个体中。由于对心脏水平的临床解读存在差异,水平手臂位置应作为所有坐姿和站姿血压听诊及示波测量的明确标准。