Suppr超能文献

高血压患者通过示波法和中心测量法获得的血压和脉压值的比较。

A comparison of blood pressure and pulse pressure values obtained by oscillometric and central measurements in hypertensive patients.

作者信息

Kayrak Mehmet, Ulgen Mehmet S, Yazici Mehmet, Yilmaz Remzi, Demir Kenan, Dogan Yildiz, Ozhan Hakan, Alihanoglu Yusuf, Koc Fatih, Bodur Sait

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey.

出版信息

Blood Press. 2010 Apr;19(2):98-103. doi: 10.3109/08037050903516318.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Wide pulse pressure (PP) affects the accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure measurements (OBPM): however, the degree of this impact on different patient groups with wide PPs is unclear. This study will investigate the accuracy of OBPM in achieving target BP and PP in isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) group compared with mixed hypertension (MHT) group.

METHOD

A total of 115 patients (70 with ISH and 45 with MHT) were enrolled in the study. Upper arm and wrist OBPM, obtained by OmronM3 and OmronR6 devices respectively, were compared with the simultaneously measured values from the ascending aorta. The ISH was defined as a systolic blood pressure (SBP) > or =140 mmHg and a diastolic blood pressure (DBP) <90 mmHg. MHT was defined as a SBP> or =140 mmHg and a DBP> or =90 mmHg.

RESULTS

The mean central arterial blood pressure (BP) and central PP were higher in the ISH group than those in the MHT group. The upper arm OBPM underestimated the central SBP in two groups (-5 mmHg, -3 mmHg, p=0.5, respectively), but overestimated DBP in the ISH group compared with MHT patients (6.8 mmHg, 1 mmHg, p=0.04, respectively). Wrist OBPM similarly underestimated to the central SBP in each group (-16 mmHg, -19 mmHg, p=0.15), whereas the sum of overestimation of DBP was significantly higher in the ISH than in the MHT group (+6 mmHg, - 1 mmHg, p=0.001, respectively). Also, each of the devices underestimated the central PP in the ISH group (about 10 mmHg) as being higher than that of the MHT group.

CONCLUSION

Oscillometric devices may be used for self-BP measurement in patients with ISH without clinically important disadvantages compared with the patients with MHT. For PP measurement in patients with ISH, there were substantial differences between intra-arterial and indirect arm BP measurements.

摘要

目的

脉压增宽(PP)会影响示波法血压测量(OBPM)的准确性;然而,这种影响在不同脉压增宽的患者群体中的程度尚不清楚。本研究将调查与混合性高血压(MHT)组相比,示波法血压测量在单纯收缩期高血压(ISH)组中实现目标血压和脉压的准确性。

方法

共有115例患者(70例ISH患者和45例MHT患者)纳入本研究。分别通过欧姆龙M3和欧姆龙R6设备获得的上臂和腕部示波法血压测量值与升主动脉同时测量的值进行比较。ISH定义为收缩压(SBP)≥140 mmHg且舒张压(DBP)<90 mmHg。MHT定义为SBP≥140 mmHg且DBP≥90 mmHg。

结果

ISH组的平均中心动脉血压(BP)和中心脉压高于MHT组。两组上臂示波法血压测量均低估了中心收缩压(分别为-5 mmHg,-3 mmHg,p = 0.5),但与MHT患者相比,ISH组高估了舒张压(分别为6.8 mmHg,1 mmHg,p = 0.04)。腕部示波法血压测量同样在每组中低估了中心收缩压(-16 mmHg,-19 mmHg,p = 0.15),而ISH组舒张压高估总和显著高于MHT组(分别为+6 mmHg,-1 mmHg,p = 0.001)。此外,每种设备均低估了ISH组的中心脉压(约10 mmHg),使其高于MHT组。

结论

与MHT患者相比,示波法设备可用于ISH患者的自我血压测量,且无临床重要劣势。对于ISH患者的脉压测量,动脉内血压测量和间接上臂血压测量之间存在显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验