Colegrave Melanie, Patel Hitesh, Offer Gerald, Chantler Peter D
Unit of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Royal Veterinary College, University of London, Royal College Street, London NW1 0TU, UK.
Biochem J. 2003 Aug 15;374(Pt 1):89-96. doi: 10.1042/BJ20030404.
Regulatory myosins are controlled through mechanisms intrinsic to their structures and can alternate between activated and inhibited states. However, the structural difference between these two states is unclear. Scallop (Pecten maximus) striated adductor myosin is activated directly by calcium. It has been proposed that the two heads of scallop myosin are symmetrically arranged and interact through their regulatory light chains [Offer and Knight (1996) J. Mol. Biol. 256, 407-416], the interface being strengthened in the inhibited state. By contrast, vertebrate smooth-muscle myosin is activated by phosphorylation. Its structure in the inhibited state has been determined from two-dimensional crystalline arrays [Wendt, Taylor, Trybus and Taylor (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 4361-4366] and is asymmetric, requiring no interaction between regulatory light chains. Using site-directed mutagenesis of the scallop regulatory light chain, we have tested the symmetric model for scallop adductor muscle myosin. Specifically, we have made myosin hybrid molecules from scallop (P. maximus) myosin, in which the normal regulatory light chains have been replaced by expressed light chains containing mutations in three residues proposed to participate in the interaction between regulatory light chains. The mutations were R126A (Arg126-->Ala), K130A and E131A; made singly, in pairs or all three together, these mutations were designed to eliminate hydrogen bonding or salt linkages between heads, which are key features of this model. Functional assays to address the competence of these hybrid myosins to bind calcium specifically, to exhibit a calcium-regulated myofibrillar Mg-ATPase and to display calcium-dependent actin sliding were performed. We conclude that the symmetrical model does not describe the inhibited state of scallop regulatory myosin and that an asymmetric structure is a plausible alternative.
调节性肌球蛋白通过其结构固有的机制进行调控,能够在激活态和抑制态之间转换。然而,这两种状态之间的结构差异尚不清楚。扇贝(大扇贝)横纹肌内收肌肌球蛋白直接由钙激活。有人提出,扇贝肌球蛋白的两个头部呈对称排列,并通过其调节轻链相互作用[奥弗和奈特(1996年)《分子生物学杂志》第256卷,407 - 416页],在抑制态时界面得到加强。相比之下,脊椎动物平滑肌肌球蛋白通过磷酸化激活。其抑制态的结构已通过二维晶体阵列确定[温特、泰勒、特里布斯和泰勒(2001年)《美国国家科学院院刊》第98卷,4361 - 4366页],且是不对称的,不需要调节轻链之间的相互作用。通过对扇贝调节轻链进行定点诱变,我们对扇贝内收肌肌球蛋白的对称模型进行了测试。具体而言,我们用扇贝(大扇贝)肌球蛋白制备了肌球蛋白杂交分子,其中正常的调节轻链已被含有三个参与调节轻链间相互作用的残基发生突变的表达轻链所取代。这些突变分别是R126A(精氨酸126→丙氨酸)、K130A和E131A;这些突变单独、成对或一起进行,旨在消除头部之间的氢键或盐键,而这些是该模型的关键特征。我们进行了功能测定,以研究这些杂交肌球蛋白特异性结合钙、表现出钙调节的肌原纤维镁 - ATP酶以及展示钙依赖性肌动蛋白滑动的能力。我们得出结论,对称模型并不能描述扇贝调节性肌球蛋白的抑制态,不对称结构是一个合理的替代方案。