Savelieva Irina, Camm A John
Department of Cardiological Sciences, St. George's Hospital Medical School, Cranmer Terrace, London SW1 0RE, United Kingdom.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2003 Apr;8(2):103-15. doi: 10.1023/a:1023652732297.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is now recognized as the most prevalent sustained cardiac arrhythmia and it is associated with considerable mortality and morbidity. The demand for effective therapeutic strategies for AF has always been high and is anticipated to further increase. Anticoagulation and pharmacologic antiarrhythmic therapy or radiofrequency catheter ablation remain the mainstay of treatment for AF. Among the wide range of nonpharmacologic options which are presently being investigated, only ablation in or around the pulmonary veins and the surgical maze procedure have been shown to accomplish the aim of the curative treatment of the arrhythmia. Preventative atrial pacing and antitachycardia pacing may offer an attractive alternative option for the management of AF by either eliminating the triggers and/or by modifying the substrate of the arrhythmia. The results of several recent trials have shown a significant increase in the time to first AF recurrence, a decrease in atrial conduction time, and a trend towards reduction in AF burden, suggesting that atrial pacing may prevent AF due to improved synchronization of atrial depolarization. The recognition of potential triggers of AF, such as atrial premature complexes, short-long sequence, and bradycardia, has encouraged the development of novel atrial pacing algorithms designed to prevent the initiation of the arrhythmia on an individual basis. Observations of AF often starting with regular atrial activity consistent with atrial tachycardia have supported the hypothesis that early antitachycardia pacing may prevent progression to AF. The concept of "hybrid therapy" based on the combination of several different therapeutic strategies suggests that antitachycardia pacing therapy, integrated with an atrial defibrillator and preventative atrial pacing modes, may act synergistically to prevent AF. Dual chamber cardioverter-defibrillators with capacity to prevent and interrupt AF may offer more comprehensive and successful treatment for patients with advanced heart disease, frequent paroxysms of AF, and the risk of proarrhythmia.
心房颤动(AF)现已被公认为最常见的持续性心律失常,并且与相当高的死亡率和发病率相关。对房颤有效治疗策略的需求一直很高,而且预计还会进一步增加。抗凝、药物抗心律失常治疗或射频导管消融仍然是房颤治疗的主要手段。在目前正在研究的众多非药物治疗选择中,只有肺静脉内或其周围的消融以及外科迷宫手术已被证明能够实现心律失常根治性治疗的目标。预防性心房起搏和抗心动过速起搏可能为房颤的管理提供一种有吸引力的替代选择,通过消除触发因素和/或改变心律失常的基质来实现。最近几项试验的结果显示,首次房颤复发时间显著延长,心房传导时间缩短,房颤负荷有降低趋势,这表明心房起搏可能由于改善心房去极化同步性而预防房颤。对房颤潜在触发因素的认识,如房性早搏、短-长序列和心动过缓,促使了旨在个体化预防心律失常发作的新型心房起搏算法的发展。房颤常始于与房性心动过速一致的规则心房活动的观察结果支持了早期抗心动过速起搏可能预防进展为房颤的假说。基于几种不同治疗策略组合的“混合疗法”概念表明,抗心动过速起搏治疗与心房除颤器和预防性心房起搏模式相结合可能协同作用以预防房颤。具有预防和中断房颤能力的双腔心脏复律除颤器可能为患有晚期心脏病、频繁阵发性房颤和有促心律失常风险的患者提供更全面、更成功的治疗。