Khan Ijaz A, Mehta Nirav J, Gowda Ramesh M
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine, 3006 Webster St., Omaha, NE 68131, USA.
Int J Cardiol. 2003 Jun;89(2-3):239-48. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5273(02)00477-1.
The efficacy and safety of amiodarone for pharmacological cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation was examined by reviewing the trials on the subject identified through a comprehensive literature search. Amiodarone has been used both intravenously (i.v.) and orally for the pharmacological cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation. Intravenous amiodarone has been used as a bolus only or as a bolus followed by a continuous i.v. infusion until conversion or up to 24 h. The dose of i.v. bolus given ranged from 3 to 7 mg/kg body weight and that of infusion from 900 to 3000 mg/day. The efficacy reported is 34-69% with the bolus only regimens, and 55-95% with the bolus followed by infusion regimens. Only the higher dose (>1500 mg/day) amiodarone is superior to placebo in converting recent-onset atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. The highest 24-h conversion rates have been reported with the i.v. regimen of 125 mg/h until conversion or a maximum of 3 g and the oral regimen of 25-30 mg/kg body weight administered as a single loading-dose (>90% and >85%, respectively). Most of the conversions occur after 6-8 h of the initiation of therapy. Predictors of successful conversion are shorter duration of atrial fibrillation, smaller left atrial size, and higher amiodarone dose. Amiodarone is not superior to the other antiarrhythmic drugs conventionally used for the pharmacological cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation but is relatively safe in patients with structural heart disease and in those with depressed left ventricle function. Therefore, amiodarone could be used particularly in patients with structural heart disease and in those with left ventricular systolic dysfunction as the use of class IC drugs, propafenone and flecainide, for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation is contraindicated in such patients.
通过回顾经全面文献检索确定的相关试验,对胺碘酮用于近期发作房颤药物复律的疗效和安全性进行了研究。胺碘酮已被用于近期发作房颤的静脉内(i.v.)和口服药物复律。静脉内胺碘酮仅作为推注使用,或先推注后持续静脉输注直至复律或长达24小时。静脉推注剂量为3至7mg/kg体重,输注剂量为900至3000mg/天。仅推注方案报告的疗效为34%-69%,推注后输注方案的疗效为55%-95%。只有较高剂量(>1500mg/天)的胺碘酮在将近期发作房颤转为窦性心律方面优于安慰剂。据报告,静脉输注方案125mg/h直至复律或最大3g以及口服方案25-30mg/kg体重作为单次负荷剂量(分别>90%和>85%)的24小时最高复律率。大多数复律发生在治疗开始后6-8小时。成功复律的预测因素是房颤持续时间较短、左心房较小以及胺碘酮剂量较高。胺碘酮在近期发作房颤药物复律方面并不优于传统使用的其他抗心律失常药物,但在结构性心脏病患者和左心室功能减退患者中相对安全。因此,胺碘酮尤其可用于结构性心脏病患者和左心室收缩功能障碍患者,因为在这类患者中,使用IC类药物普罗帕酮和氟卡尼进行房颤复律是禁忌的。