Kanoupakis Emmanuel M, Kochiadakis George E, Manios Emmanuel G, Igoumenidis Nikolaos E, Mavrakis Hercules E, Vardas Panos E
Cardiology Department, University Hospital of Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2003 Feb;8(1):19-26. doi: 10.1023/a:1022367311529.
In clinical practice the use of intravenous amiodarone has been proposed for the conversion of recurrent atrial fibrillation in patients already under chronic treatment with the same drug. Given that intravenous amiodarone exhibits different electrophysiological properties than when the drug is taken orally over a long period, this approach seems reasonable, but its effectiveness and safety have not been investigated systematically before. Of 45 patients under chronic treatment with amiodarone for the maintenance of sinus rhythm who had atrial fibrillation of recent onset, 23 were given intravenous loading of the same drug for 24 hours and 22 received placebo. Nine patients underwent an electrophysiological study several months after the successful restoration of sinus rhythm, before and after another intravenous loading dose of amiodarone, in order to examine the possible electrophysiological changes. In the amiodarone group 20 patients were successfully converted to sinus rhythm, compared to 13 of the placebo group (p < 0.05). No serious side effects of the intravenous administration were observed. Prolongation of refractoriness was seen in all 9 patients who underwent electrophysiological study after intravenous loading, without any effect on repolarization, atrioventricular conduction or sinus node function. In conclusion an intravenous loading dose of amiodarone exerts an additional electrophysiological effect in patients already under chronic treatment with the same drug. Such a combined therapy could be used with a high efficacy and safety for the conversion of recent onset atrial fibrillation in patients who are receiving long-term amiodarone therapy.
在临床实践中,有人提出对已长期接受胺碘酮治疗的患者,使用静脉注射胺碘酮来转复复发性心房颤动。鉴于静脉注射胺碘酮与长期口服该药时表现出不同的电生理特性,这种方法似乎合理,但此前尚未对其有效性和安全性进行系统研究。45例长期接受胺碘酮治疗以维持窦性心律且近期发生心房颤动的患者中,23例接受了24小时静脉注射相同药物的负荷量,22例接受了安慰剂治疗。9例患者在窦性心律成功恢复数月后,在再次静脉注射胺碘酮负荷剂量前后进行了电生理研究,以检查可能的电生理变化。胺碘酮组20例患者成功转复为窦性心律,而安慰剂组为13例(p<0.05)。未观察到静脉给药的严重副作用。在静脉注射负荷剂量后接受电生理研究的所有9例患者中均可见不应期延长,对复极化、房室传导或窦房结功能无任何影响。总之,静脉注射胺碘酮负荷剂量对已长期接受相同药物治疗的患者具有额外的电生理作用。这种联合治疗可高效、安全地用于转复接受长期胺碘酮治疗患者的近期发生的心房颤动。