Ogata Haruhiko, Hibi Toshifumi
Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Curr Pharm Des. 2003;9(14):1107-13. doi: 10.2174/1381612033455035.
Although the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains elusive, it appears that there is chronic activation of the immune and inflammatory cascade in genetically susceptible individuals. Current disease management guidelines have therefore focused on the use of anti-inflammatory agents, aminosalicylates and corticosteroids. These conventional therapies continue to be a first choice in the management of IBD. Immunomodulators, such as azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate or cyclosporin, are demonstrating increasing importance against steroid-resistant and steroid-dependent patients. However, some patients are still refractory to these therapies. Recent advances in the understanding of the pathophysiological conditions of IBD have provided new immune system modulators as therapeutic tools. Other immunosuppressive agents including FK506 and thalidomide have expanded the choice of medical therapies available for certain subgroups of patients. Furthermore, biological therapies have begun to assume a prominent role. Studies with chimeric monoclonal anti-TNF-alpha antibody treatment have been reported with dramatic successes. However, observations in larger numbers of treated patients are needed to explicate fully the safety of or risks posed by this agent such as developing lymphoma, or other malignancies. Another anti-inflammatory cytokine-therapy includes anti anti-IL-6R, anti-IL-12 or toxin-conjugated anti IL-7R, recombinant cytokines (IL-10 or IL-11). Given the diversity of proinflammatory products under its control, NF-kappaB may be viewed as a master switch in lymphocytes and macrophages, regulating inflammation and immunity. Although some of them still need more confirmatory studies, those immune therapies will provide new insights into cell-based and gene-based treatment against IBD in near future.
尽管炎症性肠病(IBD)的发病机制仍不清楚,但在遗传易感个体中似乎存在免疫和炎症级联反应的慢性激活。因此,当前的疾病管理指南侧重于使用抗炎药、氨基水杨酸酯和皮质类固醇。这些传统疗法仍然是IBD治疗的首选。免疫调节剂,如硫唑嘌呤、6-巯基嘌呤、甲氨蝶呤或环孢素,对类固醇抵抗和类固醇依赖患者的重要性日益凸显。然而,一些患者对这些疗法仍然无效。对IBD病理生理状况认识的最新进展提供了新的免疫系统调节剂作为治疗工具。其他免疫抑制剂,包括FK506和沙利度胺,扩大了某些患者亚组可用的药物治疗选择。此外,生物疗法已开始发挥重要作用。嵌合单克隆抗TNF-α抗体治疗的研究已取得显著成功。然而,需要对更多接受治疗的患者进行观察,以充分阐明该药物的安全性或所带来的风险,如发生淋巴瘤或其他恶性肿瘤。另一种抗炎细胞因子疗法包括抗IL-6R、抗IL-12或毒素偶联抗IL-7R、重组细胞因子(IL-10或IL-11)。鉴于其控制下促炎产物的多样性,NF-κB可被视为淋巴细胞和巨噬细胞中的主开关,调节炎症和免疫。尽管其中一些仍需要更多的验证性研究,但这些免疫疗法将在不久的将来为基于细胞和基因的IBD治疗提供新的见解。