Suppr超能文献

公开报告医院绩效对高死亡率医院的市场份额和风险调整后死亡率的影响。

The effect of publicly reporting hospital performance on market share and risk-adjusted mortality at high-mortality hospitals.

作者信息

Baker David W, Einstadter Doug, Thomas Charles, Husak Scott, Gordon Nahida H, Cebul Randall D

机构信息

Center for Health Care Research and Policy, Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Med Care. 2003 Jun;41(6):729-40. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000064640.66138.9A.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether publicly reporting hospitals' risk-adjusted mortality affects market share and mortality at outlier hospitals.

OBJECTIVES

To examine hospitals' market share and risk-adjusted mortality from 1991 to 1997 at hospitals participating in Cleveland Health Quality Choice (CHQC).

RESEARCH DESIGN

Time series.

SUBJECTS

Changes in market share were examined for all patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, obstructive pulmonary disease, pneumonia, or stroke at all 30 nonfederal hospitals in Northeast Ohio. Patients insured by Medicare were used to examine changes in mortality.

MEASURES

Trends in market share (proportion of patients with the target conditions discharged from a given hospital) and risk-adjusted 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

CHQC identified several hospitals with consistently higher than expected mortality. The five hospitals with the highest mortality tended to lose market share (mean change -0.6%, 95% CI -1.9-0.6), but this was not significant. The only outlier hospital with a large decline in market share had declining volume for 2 years before being declared an outlier. Risk-adjusted mortality declined only slightly at hospitals classified by us as "below average" (-0.8%; 95% CI, 2.9-1.8%) or "worst" (-0.4%; 95% CI -2.3-1.7). However, risk-adjusted mortality at one hospital changed from consistently above expected to consistently below expected shortly after first being declared an outlier.

CONCLUSION

Despite CHQC's strengths, identifying hospitals with higher than expected mortality did not adversely affect their market share or, with one exception, lead to improved outcomes. This failure may have resulted from consumer disinterest or difficulty interpreting CHQC reports, unwillingness of businesses to create incentives targeted to hospitals' performance, and hospitals' inability to develop effective quality improvement programs.

摘要

背景

公开报告医院经风险调整后的死亡率是否会影响异常值医院的市场份额和死亡率尚不清楚。

目的

研究1991年至1997年参与克利夫兰健康质量选择(CHQC)的医院的市场份额和经风险调整后的死亡率。

研究设计

时间序列。

研究对象

对俄亥俄州东北部所有30家非联邦医院中因急性心肌梗死、心力衰竭、胃肠道出血、阻塞性肺病、肺炎或中风住院的所有患者的市场份额变化进行了研究。使用医疗保险参保患者来研究死亡率变化。

测量指标

市场份额趋势(特定医院出院的目标疾病患者比例)和经风险调整的30天死亡率。

结果

CHQC识别出几家死亡率一直高于预期的医院。死亡率最高的五家医院往往会失去市场份额(平均变化-0.6%,95%置信区间-1.9 - 0.6),但这并不显著。唯一一家市场份额大幅下降的异常值医院在被宣布为异常值之前的两年里业务量一直在下降。在我们分类为“低于平均水平”(-0.8%;95%置信区间,2.9 - 1.8%)或“最差”(-0.4%;95%置信区间-2.3 - 1.7)的医院中,经风险调整后的死亡率仅略有下降。然而,一家医院在首次被宣布为异常值后不久,其经风险调整后的死亡率就从一直高于预期变为一直低于预期。

结论

尽管CHQC有优势,但识别出死亡率高于预期的医院并未对其市场份额产生不利影响,除了一个例外,也未导致结果改善。这种失败可能是由于消费者不感兴趣或难以解读CHQC报告、企业不愿针对医院绩效制定激励措施以及医院无法制定有效的质量改进计划。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验