• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Can within-category naming identify subtle cognitive deficits in the mild traumatic brain-injured patient?

作者信息

Barrow Irene M, Hough Monica, Rastatter Michael P, Walker Marianna, Holbert Donald, Rotondo Michael F

机构信息

Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, School of Allied Health Sciences, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2003 May;54(5):888-95; discussion 895-7. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000057150.60668.7C.

DOI:10.1097/01.TA.0000057150.60668.7C
PMID:12777901
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This investigation examined the effect of a speeded, computer-controlled task on detecting differences in latency and accuracy of within-category name generation in adults having sustained a mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI).

METHODS

Twenty-four adults in acute recovery and 24 age-matched controls were instructed to view 72 pictures on a computer monitor, and then name another item belonging to the same category as the visual stimulus as quickly as possible.

RESULTS

The MTBI group demonstrated significantly longer latencies (p < 0.001) and lower accuracy (p < 0.001) than the control group. Both groups displayed similar patterns of response, although the MTBI group produced significantly more perseverative errors (p < 0.001). No significant correlations were found between performance on the Scales of Cognitive Ability for Traumatic Brain Injury and response latency or accuracy.

CONCLUSION

The MTBI group performed the task significantly slower and less accurately than controls. Reaction time measures may prove more sensitive than traditional assessment measures in detecting subtle difficulties.

摘要

相似文献

1
Can within-category naming identify subtle cognitive deficits in the mild traumatic brain-injured patient?
J Trauma. 2003 May;54(5):888-95; discussion 895-7. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000057150.60668.7C.
2
The influence of an auditory distraction on rapid naming after a mild traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal study.
J Trauma. 2006 Nov;61(5):1142-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000241238.70269.c1.
3
The intermediate visual and auditory continuous performance test as a neuropsychological measure.作为一种神经心理学测量方法的中级视觉和听觉持续性操作测验。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2003 Mar;18(2):199-214.
4
Long-term neuropsychological outcomes following mild traumatic brain injury.轻度创伤性脑损伤后的长期神经心理学预后
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2005 May;11(3):228-36. doi: 10.1017/S1355617705050289.
5
The Integrated Visual and Auditory Continuous Performance Test as a neuropsychological measure.综合视觉与听觉持续性操作测试作为一种神经心理学测量方法。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2003 Jul;18(5):439-54.
6
Diffusion tensor imaging of acute mild traumatic brain injury in adolescents.青少年急性轻度创伤性脑损伤的扩散张量成像
Neurology. 2008 Mar 18;70(12):948-55. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000305961.68029.54.
7
The effects of mild traumatic brain injury on confrontation naming in adults.轻度创伤性脑损伤对成人面对面命名的影响。
Brain Inj. 2006 Jul;20(8):845-55. doi: 10.1080/02699050600832445.
8
Oculomotor function in chronic traumatic brain injury.慢性创伤性脑损伤中的动眼功能
Cogn Behav Neurol. 2007 Sep;20(3):170-8. doi: 10.1097/WNN.0b013e318142badb.
9
Neurocognitive evaluation of mild traumatic brain injury in the hospitalized pediatric population.住院儿科人群中轻度创伤性脑损伤的神经认知评估。
Ann Surg. 2009 May;249(5):859-63. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181a41ae5.
10
Mild traumatic brain injury and its sequelae: characterisation of divided attention deficits.轻度创伤性脑损伤及其后遗症:注意力分散缺陷的特征
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2009 Jan;19(1):110-37. doi: 10.1080/09602010802106486. Epub 2008 Jun 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Discourse Performance in Adults With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, Orthopedic Injuries, and Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, and Healthy Controls.成年人轻度创伤性脑损伤、骨科损伤、中重度创伤性脑损伤与健康对照组的言语表现。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022 Jan 18;31(1):67-83. doi: 10.1044/2021_AJSLP-20-00299. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
2
Reaction time and cognitive-linguistic performance in adults with mild traumatic brain injury.轻度创伤性脑损伤成人的反应时间和认知语言表现
Brain Inj. 2019;33(9):1173-1183. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2019.1632487. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
3
Implicit causality bias in adults with traumatic brain injury.
创伤性脑损伤成人的内隐因果偏差
J Commun Disord. 2018 Jan-Feb;71:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2017.12.003. Epub 2017 Dec 5.