• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Reaction time and cognitive-linguistic performance in adults with mild traumatic brain injury.轻度创伤性脑损伤成人的反应时间和认知语言表现
Brain Inj. 2019;33(9):1173-1183. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2019.1632487. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
2
Language Comprehension After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: The Role of Speed.轻度外伤性脑损伤后的语言理解:速度的作用。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Nov 19;28(4):1479-1490. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-18-0203. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
3
Unravelling the influence of mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) on cognitive-linguistic processing: a comparative group analysis.揭示轻度创伤性脑损伤(MTBI)对认知语言加工的影响:一项比较组分析。
Brain Inj. 2013 Jun;27(6):671-6. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2013.775500. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
4
Discourse Performance in Adults With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, Orthopedic Injuries, and Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, and Healthy Controls.成年人轻度创伤性脑损伤、骨科损伤、中重度创伤性脑损伤与健康对照组的言语表现。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022 Jan 18;31(1):67-83. doi: 10.1044/2021_AJSLP-20-00299. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
5
Detection of Subtle Cognitive Changes after mTBI Using a Novel Tablet-Based Task.使用新型平板电脑任务检测轻度创伤性脑损伤后的细微认知变化。
J Neurotrauma. 2016 Jul 1;33(13):1237-46. doi: 10.1089/neu.2015.3990. Epub 2015 Nov 19.
6
Can within-category naming identify subtle cognitive deficits in the mild traumatic brain-injured patient?
J Trauma. 2003 May;54(5):888-95; discussion 895-7. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000057150.60668.7C.
7
Cognitive-communication performance following mild traumatic brain injury: Influence of sex, age, education, site of lesion and bilingualism.轻度创伤性脑损伤后的认知-沟通表现:性别、年龄、教育、病变部位和双语的影响。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2021 Jan;56(1):130-144. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12589. Epub 2020 Dec 27.
8
Cognitive reserve and persistent post-concussion symptoms--A prospective mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) cohort study.认知储备与持续性脑震荡后症状——一项轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)前瞻性队列研究。
Brain Inj. 2016;30(2):146-55. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2015.1089598. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
9
Toward Return to Duty Decision-Making After Military Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Preliminary Validation of the Charge of Quarters Duty Test.军事性轻度创伤性脑损伤后重返岗位决策:营区值日测试的初步验证
Mil Med. 2018 Jul 1;183(7-8):e214-e222. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usx045.
10
Acute S100B in serum is associated with cognitive symptoms and memory performance 4 months after paediatric mild traumatic brain injury.小儿轻度创伤性脑损伤4个月后,血清中急性S100B蛋白与认知症状及记忆表现相关。
Brain Inj. 2015;29(13-14):1667-73. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2015.1075250. Epub 2015 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

1
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Use of the National Institutes of Health Toolbox Cognition Battery in Clinical Populations.对国立卫生研究院工具箱认知电池在临床人群中的应用的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2025 Jul 7. doi: 10.1007/s11065-025-09669-3.
2
Neuromechanical Models of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Conditioned on Reaction Time: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.基于反应时间的轻度创伤性脑损伤神经力学模型:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 16;13(24):7648. doi: 10.3390/jcm13247648.
3
Psychiatric disorders in post-traumatic brain injury patients: A scoping review.创伤性脑损伤患者的精神障碍:一项范围综述。
Heliyon. 2023 Jan 10;9(1):e12905. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e12905. eCollection 2023 Jan.
4
Self-Perception of Cognitive-Communication Functions After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.轻度外伤性脑损伤后的认知-交流功能的自我感知。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Mar 23;32(2S):883-906. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJSLP-22-00101. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
5
Discourse Performance in Adults With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, Orthopedic Injuries, and Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, and Healthy Controls.成年人轻度创伤性脑损伤、骨科损伤、中重度创伤性脑损伤与健康对照组的言语表现。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022 Jan 18;31(1):67-83. doi: 10.1044/2021_AJSLP-20-00299. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
6
Methodological Problems With Online Concussion Testing.在线脑震荡测试的方法学问题。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Oct 1;14:509091. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.509091. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical challenges in the diagnosis and assessment of sports-related concussion.运动相关脑震荡诊断与评估中的临床挑战
Neurol Clin Pract. 2015 Feb;5(1):2-5. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000061.
2
Sentence Processing in Traumatic Brain Injury: Evidence From the P600.创伤性脑损伤中的句子处理:来自P600的证据
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2016 Aug 1;59(4):759-71. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0104.
3
Subacute posttraumatic complaints and psychological distress in trauma patients with or without mild traumatic brain injury.有或无轻度创伤性脑损伤的创伤患者的亚急性创伤后主诉和心理困扰
Injury. 2016 Sep;47(9):2041-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.04.036. Epub 2016 Apr 24.
4
Choosing appropriate comparison group participants in studies of veterans: Characteristics of orthopedically injured and uninjured Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation New Dawn veterans.在退伍军人研究中选择合适的对照组参与者:持久自由行动/伊拉克自由行动/新黎明行动中骨科受伤和未受伤退伍军人的特征
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2016 Sep;38(7):811-9. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2016.1167172. Epub 2016 May 12.
5
Speed of processing and strategic control of attention after traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤后注意力的加工速度与策略控制
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2015;37(10):1024-35. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2015.1074663. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
6
Measuring executive function in control subjects and TBI patients with question completion time (QCT).通过问题完成时间(QCT)测量对照组受试者和创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者的执行功能。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 May 19;9:288. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00288. eCollection 2015.
7
Medical treatment of concussion.脑震荡的医学治疗。
Semin Speech Lang. 2014 Aug;35(3):155-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1384676. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
8
Duration and course of post-concussive symptoms.脑震荡后症状的持续时间和过程。
Pediatrics. 2014 Jun;133(6):999-1006. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-0158. Epub 2014 May 12.
9
Normative Data for the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI) and post-concussion symptom profiles among TBI, PTSD, and nonclinical samples.创伤性脑损伤(TBI)、创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和非临床样本中神经行为症状量表(NSI)的常模数据及脑震荡后症状概况。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2014;28(4):614-32. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2014.894576. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
10
Acute evaluation of conversational discourse skills in traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤中对话语篇技能的急性评估
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014 Dec;16(6):582-93. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2013.871335. Epub 2014 Jan 21.

轻度创伤性脑损伤成人的反应时间和认知语言表现

Reaction time and cognitive-linguistic performance in adults with mild traumatic brain injury.

作者信息

Norman Rocío S, Shah Manish N, Turkstra Lyn S

机构信息

a Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Wisconsin-Madison , Madison , WI , USA.

b BerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Medicine and Public Health , Madison , WI , USA.

出版信息

Brain Inj. 2019;33(9):1173-1183. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2019.1632487. Epub 2019 Jul 11.

DOI:10.1080/02699052.2019.1632487
PMID:31291747
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6696949/
Abstract

: The purpose of this study was to characterize cognitive-linguistic performance in adults with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) to advance assessment and treatment practices. We hypothesized that individuals with mTBI would demonstrate longer reaction times (RTs) and greater error rates when compared to an orthopedic injury (OI) group on a category-naming task. : Participants were age and education-matched adults with mTBI (n = 20; 12 females) and adults with OI (n = 21; 5 females) who were discharged to home after an Emergency Department visit. Our primary task was a category-naming task shown to be sensitive to language deficits after mTBI. The task was adapted and administered under speeded and unspeeded conditions. : There was a significant main effect of condition on RT (speeded faster than unspeeded) and accuracy (more errors in the speeded condition). There was a marginally significant effect of group on errors, with more errors in the mTBI group than the OI group. Naming RT and accuracy in both conditions were moderately correlated with injury variables and symptom burden. : Our data showed a marginal effect of group on accuracy of performance. Correlations found between naming and neurobehavioural symptoms, including sleep quality, suggest that the latter should be considered in future research.

摘要

本研究的目的是描述轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)成人的认知语言表现,以推进评估和治疗实践。我们假设,在类别命名任务中,与骨科损伤(OI)组相比,mTBI个体将表现出更长的反应时间(RTs)和更高的错误率。参与者是年龄和教育程度匹配的mTBI成人(n = 20;12名女性)和OI成人(n = 21;5名女性),他们在急诊科就诊后出院回家。我们的主要任务是一项类别命名任务,该任务已被证明对mTBI后的语言缺陷敏感。该任务在有时间限制和无时间限制的条件下进行了调整和实施。条件对RT(有时间限制时比无时间限制时更快)和准确性(有时间限制的条件下错误更多)有显著的主效应。组对错误有边缘显著效应,mTBI组的错误比OI组更多。两种条件下的命名RT和准确性与损伤变量和症状负担呈中度相关。我们的数据显示组对表现准确性有边缘效应。在命名与神经行为症状(包括睡眠质量)之间发现的相关性表明,在未来的研究中应考虑后者。