Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio.
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022 Jan 18;31(1):67-83. doi: 10.1044/2021_AJSLP-20-00299. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
Adults with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) are at risk for communication disorders, yet studies exploring cognitive-communication performance are currently lacking.
This aim of this study was to characterize discourse-level performance by adults with mTBI on a standardized elicitation task and compare it to (a) healthy adults, (b) adults with orthopedic injuries (OIs), and (c) adults with moderate to severe TBI.
This study used a cross-sectional design. The participants included mTBI and OI groups recruited prospectively from an emergency medicine department. Moderate to severe TBI and healthy data were acquired from TalkBank. One-way analyses of variance were used to compare mean linguistic scores.
Seventy participants across all groups were recruited. Groups did not differ on demographic variables. The study found significant differences in both content and productivity measures among the groups. Variables did not appear sensitive to differentiate between mTBI and OI groups.
Cognitive and language performance of adults with mTBI is a pressing clinical issue. Studies exploring language with carefully selected control groups can influence the development of sensitive measures to identify individuals with cognitive-communication deficits.
患有轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)的成年人存在沟通障碍的风险,但目前缺乏探索认知-沟通表现的研究。
本研究旨在通过标准化诱发任务描述 mTBI 成年人的话语水平表现,并将其与(a)健康成年人、(b)骨科损伤(OI)成年人和(c)中重度 TBI 成年人进行比较。
本研究采用横断面设计。参与者包括前瞻性从急诊医学部招募的 mTBI 和 OI 组。中重度 TBI 和健康数据来自 TalkBank。采用单因素方差分析比较平均语言评分。
所有组共招募了 70 名参与者。各组在人口统计学变量上无差异。研究发现,各组在内容和产量测量方面存在显著差异。变量似乎无法区分 mTBI 和 OI 组。
成年人 mTBI 的认知和语言表现是一个紧迫的临床问题。使用精心挑选的对照组探索语言的研究可以影响开发敏感措施来识别存在认知-沟通缺陷的个体。