Suppr超能文献

成年人轻度创伤性脑损伤、骨科损伤、中重度创伤性脑损伤与健康对照组的言语表现。

Discourse Performance in Adults With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, Orthopedic Injuries, and Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, and Healthy Controls.

机构信息

Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio.

Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

出版信息

Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022 Jan 18;31(1):67-83. doi: 10.1044/2021_AJSLP-20-00299. Epub 2021 Oct 25.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Adults with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) are at risk for communication disorders, yet studies exploring cognitive-communication performance are currently lacking.

AIMS

This aim of this study was to characterize discourse-level performance by adults with mTBI on a standardized elicitation task and compare it to (a) healthy adults, (b) adults with orthopedic injuries (OIs), and (c) adults with moderate to severe TBI.

METHOD

This study used a cross-sectional design. The participants included mTBI and OI groups recruited prospectively from an emergency medicine department. Moderate to severe TBI and healthy data were acquired from TalkBank. One-way analyses of variance were used to compare mean linguistic scores.

RESULTS

Seventy participants across all groups were recruited. Groups did not differ on demographic variables. The study found significant differences in both content and productivity measures among the groups. Variables did not appear sensitive to differentiate between mTBI and OI groups.

DISCUSSION

Cognitive and language performance of adults with mTBI is a pressing clinical issue. Studies exploring language with carefully selected control groups can influence the development of sensitive measures to identify individuals with cognitive-communication deficits.

摘要

简介

患有轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)的成年人存在沟通障碍的风险,但目前缺乏探索认知-沟通表现的研究。

目的

本研究旨在通过标准化诱发任务描述 mTBI 成年人的话语水平表现,并将其与(a)健康成年人、(b)骨科损伤(OI)成年人和(c)中重度 TBI 成年人进行比较。

方法

本研究采用横断面设计。参与者包括前瞻性从急诊医学部招募的 mTBI 和 OI 组。中重度 TBI 和健康数据来自 TalkBank。采用单因素方差分析比较平均语言评分。

结果

所有组共招募了 70 名参与者。各组在人口统计学变量上无差异。研究发现,各组在内容和产量测量方面存在显著差异。变量似乎无法区分 mTBI 和 OI 组。

讨论

成年人 mTBI 的认知和语言表现是一个紧迫的临床问题。使用精心挑选的对照组探索语言的研究可以影响开发敏感措施来识别存在认知-沟通缺陷的个体。

相似文献

2
Lifetime Traumatic Brain Injury and Cognitive Domain Deficits in Late Life: The PROTECT-TBI Cohort Study.
J Neurotrauma. 2023 Jul;40(13-14):1423-1435. doi: 10.1089/neu.2022.0360. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
3
Reaction time and cognitive-linguistic performance in adults with mild traumatic brain injury.
Brain Inj. 2019;33(9):1173-1183. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2019.1632487. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
4
Is sentence ambiguity comprehension affected after mild traumatic brain injury? Results suggest cognitive control is more important than diagnosis.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022 Sep;57(5):990-1005. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12734. Epub 2022 May 25.
5
Association of Sex and Age With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury-Related Symptoms: A TRACK-TBI Study.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e213046. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.3046.
6
Language Comprehension After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: The Role of Speed.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Nov 19;28(4):1479-1490. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-18-0203. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
7
Cognitive-communication performance following mild traumatic brain injury: Influence of sex, age, education, site of lesion and bilingualism.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2021 Jan;56(1):130-144. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12589. Epub 2020 Dec 27.
9
Cognitive task demands and discourse performance after traumatic brain injury.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2017 Jul;52(4):501-513. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12289. Epub 2016 Nov 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Narrative Discourse Performance in Traumatic Brain Injury: Does Story Comprehension Predict Story Retelling?
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024 Aug 5;67(8):2685-2697. doi: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00681. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
2
Story Grammar Analyses Capture Discourse Improvement in the First 2 Years Following a Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2024 Mar 7;33(2):1004-1020. doi: 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-23-00269. Epub 2024 Feb 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Cognitive-communication skills and acute outcome following mild traumatic brain injury.
Brain Inj. 2020 Sep 18;34(11):1472-1479. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2020.1802669. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
2
Patterns of narrative discourse in early recovery following severe Traumatic Brain Injury.
Brain Inj. 2020;34(1):98-109. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2019.1682192. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
3
Language Comprehension After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: The Role of Speed.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Nov 19;28(4):1479-1490. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-18-0203. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
4
Reaction time and cognitive-linguistic performance in adults with mild traumatic brain injury.
Brain Inj. 2019;33(9):1173-1183. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2019.1632487. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
5
Analysing coherence of oral discourse among Cantonese speakers in Mainland China with traumatic brain injury and cerebrovascular accident.
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020 Feb;22(1):37-47. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2019.1581256. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
7
Concussion: pathophysiology and clinical translation.
Handb Clin Neurol. 2018;158:51-61. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-63954-7.00006-9.
8
Sex & gender considerations in concussion research.
Concussion. 2018 Jan 18;3(1):CNC51. doi: 10.2217/cnc-2017-0015. eCollection 2018 Mar.
10
Estimating the global incidence of traumatic brain injury.
J Neurosurg. 2018 Apr 27;130(4):1080-1097. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.JNS17352. Print 2019 Apr 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验