Keenan Sean P, Sinuff Tasnim, Cook Deborah J, Hill Nicholas S
Royal Columbian Hospital, New Westminster, British Columbia V3L 5E7, Canada.
Ann Intern Med. 2003 Jun 3;138(11):861-70. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-11-200306030-00007.
Over the past decade, noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV) in the setting of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has increased in popularity. Although several trials have been published on the relative effectiveness of this treatment, apparent inconsistencies in study results remain.
To assess the effect of NPPV on rate of endotracheal intubation, length of hospital stay, and in-hospital mortality rate in patients with an acute exacerbation of COPD and to determine the effect of exacerbation severity on these outcomes.
MEDLINE (1966 to 2002) and EMBASE (1990 to 2002). Additional data sources included the Cochrane Library, personal files, abstract proceedings, reference lists of selected articles, and expert contact. There were no language restrictions.
The researchers selected randomized, controlled trials that 1) examined patients with acute exacerbation of COPD; 2) compared noninvasive ventilation and standard therapy with standard therapy alone; and 3) included need for endotracheal intubation, length of hospital stay, or hospital survival as an outcome.
Methodologic quality and results were abstracted independently and in duplicate.
The addition of NPPV to standard care in patients with an acute exacerbation of COPD decreased the rate of endotracheal intubation (risk reduction, 28% [95% CI, 15% to 40%]), length of hospital stay (absolute reduction, 4.57 days [CI, 2.30 to 6.83 days]), and in-hospital mortality rate (risk reduction, 10% [CI, 5% to 15%]). However, subgroup analysis showed that these beneficial effects occurred only in patients with severe exacerbations, not in those with milder exacerbations.
Patients with severe exacerbations of COPD benefit from the addition of NPPV to standard therapy. However, NPPV has not been shown to benefit hospitalized patients with milder COPD exacerbations.
在过去十年中,无创正压通气(NPPV)在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)急性加重期的应用越来越普遍。尽管已经发表了几项关于这种治疗相对有效性的试验,但研究结果仍存在明显的不一致。
评估NPPV对COPD急性加重期患者气管插管率、住院时间和院内死亡率的影响,并确定加重严重程度对这些结局的影响。
MEDLINE(1966年至2002年)和EMBASE(1990年至2002年)。其他数据来源包括Cochrane图书馆、个人档案、摘要汇编、所选文章的参考文献列表以及专家联系。没有语言限制。
研究人员选择了随机对照试验,这些试验1)研究COPD急性加重期患者;2)将无创通气和标准治疗与单独的标准治疗进行比较;3)将气管插管需求、住院时间或住院生存率作为结局。
方法学质量和结果由两人独立且重复提取。
在COPD急性加重期患者的标准治疗中加用NPPV可降低气管插管率(风险降低28%[95%CI,15%至40%])、住院时间(绝对缩短4.57天[CI,2.30至6.83天])和院内死亡率(风险降低10%[CI,5%至15%])。然而,亚组分析表明,这些有益效果仅发生在重度加重患者中,而在轻度加重患者中未出现。
COPD重度加重患者在标准治疗基础上加用NPPV有益。然而,尚未证明NPPV对COPD轻度加重的住院患者有益。