• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The paradox of evidence-based medicine. Commentary on Gupta (2003), A critical appraisal of evidence-based medicine: some ethical considerations. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 9, 111-121.

作者信息

Norman Geoff

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Eval Clin Pract. 2003 May;9(2):129-32. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2003.00410.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2753.2003.00410.x
PMID:12787173
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
The paradox of evidence-based medicine. Commentary on Gupta (2003), A critical appraisal of evidence-based medicine: some ethical considerations. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 9, 111-121.循证医学的悖论。对古普塔（2003年）的评论，《对循证医学的批判性评价：一些伦理考量》。《临床实践评价杂志》9卷，第111 - 121页。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2003 May;9(2):129-32. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2003.00410.x.
2
Commentary on 'A critical appraisal of evidence-based medicine: some ethical considerations' (Gupta 2003; Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 9, 111-121).
J Eval Clin Pract. 2003 May;9(2):123-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2003.00402.x.
3
On morality and logic in medical practice: commentary on 'A critical appraisal of evidence-based medicine: some ethical considerations' (Gupta 2003; Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 9, 111-121).
J Eval Clin Pract. 2003 May;9(2):133-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2003.00400.x.
4
An objectivist's view on the ethics of evidence-based medicine: commentary on 'A critical appraisal of evidence-based medicine: some ethical considerations' (Gupta 2003; Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 9, 111-121).客观主义者对循证医学伦理学的看法：评《对循证医学的批判性评价：一些伦理考量》（古普塔，2003年；《临床实践评价杂志》第9卷，第111 - 121页）
J Eval Clin Pract. 2003 May;9(2):137-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2003.00401.x.
5
A critical appraisal of evidence-based medicine: some ethical considerations.循证医学的批判性评价：一些伦理考量
J Eval Clin Pract. 2003 May;9(2):111-21. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2003.00382.x.
6
The importance of values in evidence-based medicine.循证医学中价值观的重要性。
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Oct 12;16(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0063-3.
7
Research ethics and evidence based medicine.研究伦理与循证医学
J Med Ethics. 2004 Apr;30(2):122-5. doi: 10.1136/jme.2003.007203.
8
The ethical relevance of the standard of care in the design of clinical trials.临床试验设计中医疗护理标准的伦理相关性。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004 Mar 1;169(5):562-4. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200311-1577CP. Epub 2003 Dec 30.
9
Commentary on Gupta, Mona (2011): improved health or improved decision making? The ethical goals of EBM. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17(5), 957-963.对蒙娜·古普塔（2011年）的评论：健康改善还是决策优化？循证医学的伦理目标。《临床实践评估杂志》17(5)，957 - 963页
J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Oct;18(5):1110. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01927.x.
10
A platitude too far: 'evidence-based ethics'. Commentary on Borry (2006), Evidence-based medicine and its role in ethical decision-making. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12, 306-311.老生常谈过头了：“循证伦理学”。对博里（2006年）《循证医学及其在伦理决策中的作用》的评论。《临床实践评价杂志》12卷，第306 - 311页。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2006 Jun;12(3):312-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00590.x.