Kelly Michael P, Heath Iona, Howick Jeremy, Greenhalgh Trisha
Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0SR, UK.
Royal College of General Practitioners, London, UK.
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Oct 12;16(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0063-3.
Evidence-based medicine (EBM) has always required integration of patient values with 'best' clinical evidence. It is widely recognized that scientific practices and discoveries, including those of EBM, are value-laden. But to date, the science of EBM has focused primarily on methods for reducing bias in the evidence, while the role of values in the different aspects of the EBM process has been almost completely ignored.
In this paper, we address this gap by demonstrating how a consideration of values can enhance every aspect of EBM, including: prioritizing which tests and treatments to investigate, selecting research designs and methods, assessing effectiveness and efficiency, supporting patient choice and taking account of the limited time and resources available to busy clinicians. Since values are integral to the practice of EBM, it follows that the highest standards of EBM require values to be made explicit, systematically explored, and integrated into decision making. Through 'values based' approaches, EBM's connection to the humanitarian principles upon which it was founded will be strengthened.
循证医学(EBM)一直要求将患者价值观与“最佳”临床证据相结合。人们普遍认识到,包括循证医学在内的科学实践和发现都充满了价值观。但迄今为止,循证医学的科学主要集中在减少证据偏倚的方法上,而价值观在循证医学过程不同方面的作用几乎被完全忽视。
在本文中,我们通过展示对价值观的考量如何能提升循证医学的各个方面来填补这一空白,这些方面包括:确定研究哪些检查和治疗的优先级、选择研究设计和方法、评估有效性和效率、支持患者选择以及考虑忙碌的临床医生可用的有限时间和资源。由于价值观是循证医学实践不可或缺的一部分,因此循证医学的最高标准要求价值观得以明确、系统地探究并融入决策过程。通过“基于价值观”的方法,循证医学与它所基于的人道主义原则之间的联系将得到加强。