• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

地区综合医院的结直肠专科化。前进之路!

Colorectal subspecialization in a DGH. The way forward!

作者信息

Shankar P J, Achuthan R, Haray P N

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Prince Charles Hospital, North Glamorgan NHS Trust and School of Care Sciences, University of Glamorgan, Pontypridd, UK.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2001 Nov;3(6):396-401. doi: 10.1046/j.1463-1318.2001.00279.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1463-1318.2001.00279.x
PMID:12790937
Abstract

AIMS

To audit all aspects of the diagnosis and management of colorectal cancers by a specialist unit within a District General Hospital (DGH). To compare the clinical effectiveness of the specialist service with the service prior to specialization and attempt to assess the feasibility of setting up such a service within the constraints imposed by a DGH.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data for this study was collected prospectively over a 3-year period from July 1997 to June 2000 since the establishment of a specialist colorectal service. The results so obtained have been compared with the Trent and Wales audit of 1993 as well as with the guidelines issued by the Royal College of Surgeons of England and the Association of Colo-proctologists of Great Britain and Ireland. We have attempted to evaluate whether specialization has altered the outcome for patients with colorectal cancer.

RESULTS

A total of 2181 patients were seen at the specialist colorectal clinic and 42% underwent immediate flexible sigmoidoscopy. A total of 241 colorectal cancers were diagnosed during this period by the specialist unit, of which the rapid access clinic had picked up 191 (a pick-up rate of 8.75%). The mean age of patients with colorectal cancer was 69.23 years and the median waiting time from referral to clinic and from referral to treatment was 9 days and 24 days, respectively. These compare favourably with the waiting times prior to specialization. 117 rectal cancers were diagnosed of whom 32 (32%) underwent APER. A selective approach to short course preoperative radiotherapy resulted in 24% of rectal cancer patients receiving this treatment. The CRM was positive in 14% of resected rectal cancers, all of whom had received preoperative radiotherapy. The percentage of patients with Dukes' stage A disease has risen from 11% in 1993 to 23% and the percentage of patients undergoing emergency surgery have fallen from 29% in 1993 to 8.2%. The rate of permanent stoma formation has also decreased from 52% to 32%. This audit has also confirmed that the guidelines for the management of colorectal cancers were all being met or exceeded.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrates that, even within the constraints of a DGH, a specialist service can result in earlier diagnosis, shorter waiting periods and judicious use of adjuvant treatment leading to improved clinical effectiveness. It is possible to deliver a high quality service, which meets, and in some areas, surpasses the minimum guidelines, provided there is an integrated multidisciplinary approach.

摘要

目的

对一家地区综合医院(DGH)内的专科单位对结直肠癌诊断和管理的各个方面进行审核。将专科服务的临床效果与专科化之前的服务进行比较,并尝试评估在DGH所施加的限制条件下设立此类服务的可行性。

材料与方法

本研究的数据自1997年7月至2000年6月的3年期间前瞻性收集,自专科结直肠服务建立以来。将如此获得的结果与1993年特伦特和威尔士的审核以及英国皇家外科医师学院和大不列颠及爱尔兰结直肠病学家协会发布的指南进行了比较。我们试图评估专科化是否改变了结直肠癌患者的治疗结果。

结果

专科结直肠诊所共诊治了2181例患者,42%的患者立即接受了乙状结肠镜检查。在此期间,专科单位共诊断出241例结直肠癌,其中快速通道诊所发现了191例(检出率为8.75%)。结直肠癌患者的平均年龄为69.23岁,从转诊到诊所以及从转诊到治疗的中位等待时间分别为9天和24天。这些与专科化之前的等待时间相比具有优势。共诊断出117例直肠癌,其中32例(32%)接受了腹会阴联合切除术。对短程术前放疗采用选择性方法,导致24%的直肠癌患者接受了这种治疗。在切除的直肠癌中,14%的患者环周切缘阳性,所有这些患者均接受了术前放疗。Dukes A期疾病患者的百分比从1993年的11%上升至23%,急诊手术患者的百分比从1993年的29%降至8.2%。永久性造口形成率也从52%降至32%。此次审核还证实,结直肠癌管理指南均得到满足或超越。

结论

该研究表明,即使在DGH的限制条件下,专科服务也可导致更早的诊断、更短的等待时间以及合理使用辅助治疗,从而提高临床效果。只要采取综合的多学科方法,就有可能提供高质量的服务,该服务符合并在某些领域超越最低指南。

相似文献

1
Colorectal subspecialization in a DGH. The way forward!地区综合医院的结直肠专科化。前进之路!
Colorectal Dis. 2001 Nov;3(6):396-401. doi: 10.1046/j.1463-1318.2001.00279.x.
2
Management of colorectal cancer: variations in practice in one hospital.结直肠癌的管理:一家医院的实践差异
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2003 May;29(4):400-2. doi: 10.1053/ejso.2002.1426.
3
Workload and surgeon's specialty for outcome after colorectal cancer surgery.结直肠癌手术后的工作量及外科医生专业与手术结果的关系
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD005391. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005391.pub3.
4
Population-based audit of colorectal cancer management in two UK health regions. Colorectal Cancer Working Group, Royal College of Surgeons of England Clinical Epidemiology and Audit Unit.英国两个卫生区域基于人群的结直肠癌管理审计。结直肠癌工作组,英国皇家外科医学院临床流行病学与审计部门。
Br J Surg. 1997 Dec;84(12):1731-6.
5
Aspects of survival from colorectal cancer in Denmark.丹麦结直肠癌的生存情况
Dan Med J. 2012 Apr;59(4):B4428.
6
Audit on flexible sigmoidoscopy for rectal bleeding in a district general hospital: are we over-loading the resources?某地区综合医院针对直肠出血进行的乙状结肠镜检查审计:我们是否在过度消耗资源?
Postgrad Med J. 2004 Jan;80(939):38-40. doi: 10.1136/pmj.2003.008284.
7
Permanent stoma rates: a misleading marker of quality in rectal cancer surgery.永久性造口率:直肠癌手术质量的误导性标志物。
Colorectal Dis. 2014 Apr;16(4):276-80. doi: 10.1111/codi.12509.
8
Where should paediatric surgery be performed?小儿外科手术应在哪里进行?
Arch Dis Child. 1998 Jul;79(1):65-70; discussion 70-2. doi: 10.1136/adc.79.1.65.
9
Guidelines, compliance, and effectiveness: a 12 months' audit in an acute district general healthcare trust on the two week rule for suspected colorectal cancer.指南、合规性与有效性:对某急性区综合医疗信托机构中疑似结直肠癌两周规则进行的为期12个月的审计
Postgrad Med J. 2002 Dec;78(926):748-51. doi: 10.1136/pmj.78.926.748.
10
Same-day assessment and management of urgent (2-week wait) colorectal referrals: an analysis of the outcome of 1606 patients attending an endoscopy unit-based colorectal clinic.紧急(两周等待)结直肠转诊的当日评估与管理:对1606名前往基于内镜检查单元的结直肠诊所就诊患者的结果分析
Colorectal Dis. 2014 May;16(5):O176-81. doi: 10.1111/codi.12508.

引用本文的文献

1
The Benefits of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for ypT3-4N0M0 Rectal Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation and Surgery.新辅助放化疗及手术后辅助化疗对ypT3-4N0M0期直肠癌的益处
Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2025 Jul 28;19:11795549251359151. doi: 10.1177/11795549251359151. eCollection 2025.
2
Toward systematic reviews to understand the determinants of wait time management success to help decision-makers and managers better manage wait times.旨在进行系统评价,以了解决定等待时间管理成功的因素,帮助决策者和管理者更好地管理等待时间。
Implement Sci. 2013 Jun 6;8:61. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-61.
3
Workload and surgeon's specialty for outcome after colorectal cancer surgery.
结直肠癌手术后的工作量及外科医生专业与手术结果的关系
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD005391. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005391.pub3.
4
The impact of the Calman-Hine report on the processes and outcomes of care for Yorkshire's colorectal cancer patients.卡尔曼-海因报告对约克郡结直肠癌患者护理流程及结果的影响。
Br J Cancer. 2006 Oct 23;95(8):979-85. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603372.
5
The informational roles and psychological health of members of 10 oncology multidisciplinary teams in the UK.英国10个肿瘤多学科团队成员的信息角色与心理健康
Br J Cancer. 2005 Nov 14;93(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602816.
6
Management of colorectal cancers.结直肠癌的管理
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13(5):400-4. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.5.400.