Baron John A
Departments of Medicine, and Community and Family Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, N.H., USA.
Prog Exp Tumor Res. 2003;37:1-24. doi: 10.1159/000071364.
There is evidence that aspirin--and apparently other NSAIDs--may be protective agents against cancer in the gastrointestinal tract. These effects are particularly well documented in the colon and rectum. Even considered in isolation, the observational data regarding colorectal neoplasia are quite strong, and the reality of a protective effect is buttressed by clinical trial data showing that aspirin prevents sporadic adenomas. Furthermore, the NSAIDs sulindac celecoxib have actually led to the regression of existing colorectal polyps in patients with FAP. Clearly, NSAIDs have the potential to suppress carcinogenesis in the large bowel. Observational data suggesting inverse associations of NSAIDs with cancers of the stomach and esophagus have emerged from several case-control studies and a few cohort analyses. In some studies the findings display features often associated with causal relationships, for example decreasing risks with increasing doses or duration of use. Nonetheless, the data currently do not support a secure conclusion that NSAIDs protect against these malignancies. The relevant data are not nearly as extensive as those for the colorectum, and case-control investigation of these upper gastrointestinal sites may be particularly delicate. It is conceivable that early symptoms of cancer (or of pre-invasive lesions) may have discouraged NSAID use in the cancer patients, creating the appearance of a protective association of the drugs with the risk of these malignancies. More extensive observational data particularly from cohort studies would be desirable to confirm the existing findings and clarify the doses and durations of use required for an effect. Clinical trial investigation might also be practical for pre-neoplastic endpoints, or--in carefully selected populations--perhaps with cancer as the focus. There are only relatively limited data available regarding the effect of NSAIDs on cancer of the pancreas. However, the studies that have investigated this malignancy have reported indications that NSAIDs may have a protective effect. The effects of NSAIDs on cancers outside the gastrointestinal tract are not clear. Some investigations suggest that NSAID use, particularly aspirin, is inversely associated with risk of cancers of the breast or ovary, but several well-done studies have not seen these associations, and the observations could have been due to bias or confounding. Findings regarding prostate cancer are similarly conflicting. The urinary tract is one organ system in which several studies have reported an increased cancer risk in association with NSAID use. Nonetheless, the effects remain unclear. There is only limited available information regarding carcinoma of the bladder, and no firm conclusions can be drawn at this point. More extensive data have been generated regarding the effect of NSAIDs--largely salicylates--on renal cell carcinoma or cancer or the renal pelvis and ureter. Although some studies have reported increased risks, there are also findings suggesting no association. It is particularly difficult for observational studies to ascertain with confidence the true effects of aspirin because of the suspected relationship of these cancers with use of phenacetin and perhaps acetaminophen. Further data--particularly from careful and large cohort studies--would be important to clarify these issues. As a body of research, the findings discussed here from epidemiological studies and clinical trials have begun to clarify the effect of NSAIDs on carcinogenesis in various organs in humans. There is clear potential for protective effects at several anatomic sites. Even for the colorectum, however, it is probably premature to now begin to use these drugs widely for cancer prevention. To reach that point, a weighing of the risks and benefits of the drugs needs to be made, together with a judgement regarding the benefits of alternative means of prevention. For colorectal cancer, for example, aspirin may provide only limited benefit over regular colonoscopy [95, 96]. Nonetheless, with the increased understanding of the clinical effects of NSAIDs on cancer, the development of effective chemoprevention with these drugs appears to be a real possibility.
有证据表明,阿司匹林——显然还有其他非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)——可能是胃肠道癌症的保护剂。这些作用在结肠和直肠中记录得尤为充分。即便单独考量,关于结直肠肿瘤的观察数据也相当有力,而且阿司匹林可预防散发性腺瘤的临床试验数据也支持了其保护作用的真实性。此外,非甾体抗炎药舒林酸和塞来昔布实际上已使家族性腺瘤性息肉病(FAP)患者现有的结肠息肉消退。显然,非甾体抗炎药有抑制大肠癌变的潜力。几项病例对照研究和一些队列分析得出的观察数据表明,非甾体抗炎药与胃癌和食管癌存在负相关。在一些研究中,这些发现呈现出常与因果关系相关的特征,例如风险随剂量增加或使用时间延长而降低。然而,目前的数据并不支持非甾体抗炎药可预防这些恶性肿瘤的确切结论。相关数据远不如结直肠癌方面的数据广泛,而且对这些上消化道部位进行病例对照研究可能特别棘手。可以想象,癌症(或癌前病变)的早期症状可能使癌症患者不愿使用非甾体抗炎药,从而造成这些药物与这些恶性肿瘤风险之间存在保护关联的假象。需要更广泛的观察数据,尤其是队列研究数据,以证实现有发现并明确产生效果所需的剂量和使用时间。对于癌前终点,临床试验研究或许可行,或者——在精心挑选的人群中——或许以癌症为重点进行研究也可行。关于非甾体抗炎药对胰腺癌的影响,现有数据相对有限。然而,对这种恶性肿瘤进行研究的报告显示,非甾体抗炎药可能具有保护作用。非甾体抗炎药对胃肠道以外癌症的影响尚不清楚。一些调查表明,使用非甾体抗炎药尤其是阿司匹林与乳腺癌或卵巢癌风险呈负相关,但几项精心开展的研究并未发现这些关联,这些观察结果可能是由于偏倚或混杂因素导致的。关于前列腺癌的研究结果同样相互矛盾。泌尿系统是一个器官系统,多项研究报告称使用非甾体抗炎药会增加患癌风险。然而,其影响仍不明确。关于膀胱癌的数据有限,目前无法得出确凿结论。关于非甾体抗炎药(主要是水杨酸盐)对肾细胞癌或肾盂及输尿管癌的影响,已有更多数据。尽管一些研究报告了风险增加,但也有研究结果表明两者并无关联。由于这些癌症与使用非那西丁或许还有对乙酰氨基酚之间存在疑似关联,观察性研究很难确切确定阿司匹林的真实效果。更多数据——尤其是来自严谨且大规模队列研究的数据——对于阐明这些问题很重要。作为一项研究主体,这里讨论的流行病学研究和临床试验结果已开始阐明非甾体抗炎药对人类各器官癌变的影响。在几个解剖部位有明显的保护作用潜力。然而,即便对于结直肠癌,现在广泛使用这些药物进行癌症预防可能还为时过早。要达到这一步,需要权衡这些药物的风险和益处,并对其他预防手段的益处做出判断。例如,对于结直肠癌,阿司匹林可能仅比定期结肠镜检查提供有限的益处[95, 96]。尽管如此,随着对非甾体抗炎药对癌症临床影响的认识不断加深,利用这些药物进行有效化学预防似乎确有可能。