• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

起搏导线存活率:不同模型的性能

Pacing lead survival: performance of different models.

作者信息

Woscoboinik J R, Maloney J D, Helguera M E, Mercho N, Alexander L A, Wilkoff B, Simmons T, Morant V, Castle L W

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio 44195.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1992 Nov;15(11 Pt 2):1991-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1992.tb03008.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1540-8159.1992.tb03008.x
PMID:1279586
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Recent reports have shown poor survival of some leads currently in use. Long-term survival analysis of 2,444 leads (1,059 atrial and 1,385 ventricular) implanted in this institution since January 1980, and having at least 1 month of follow-up was performed. The survival of 123 different models was compared with the average survival of all the leads implanted in the corresponding chamber. Failure was defined as inactivation of the lead (electrical abandonment, explant, or cap) due to insulator and/or conductor fracture.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 33 +/- 32 months. The cumulative survival for different atrial lead models was consistent with the average performance in the atrium. No atrial lead showed better or worse survival compared to the others. In the ventricular group, the Medtronic 4012 lead showed statistically significant poorer survival (P = 0.01) compared with the average survival of the ventricular leads. The Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. (CPI) 4010 lead showed a nonsignificant (P = 0.12) worse performance than the average for ventricular leads.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) The Medtronic 4012 had a significantly poorer performance than the rest of the leads. A trend in similar direction was found for the CPI 4010, also in the ventricular group; (2) Atrial lead models showed a stable survival; and (3) Frequent follow-up is required for some leads, especially in pacemaker dependent patients.

摘要

未标注

近期报告显示,目前使用的一些导线生存率较低。对自1980年1月起在本机构植入的2444根导线(1059根心房导线和1385根心室导线)进行了长期生存分析,且这些导线至少随访了1个月。将123种不同型号的生存率与相应心腔内植入的所有导线的平均生存率进行了比较。故障定义为由于绝缘体和/或导体断裂导致导线失活(电遗弃、取出或封帽)。

结果

平均随访时间为33±32个月。不同心房导线型号的累积生存率与心房的平均表现一致。与其他心房导线相比,没有一种心房导线显示出更好或更差的生存率。在心室组中,美敦力4012导线的生存率与心室导线的平均生存率相比,在统计学上显著较差(P = 0.01)。心脏起搏器公司(CPI)4010导线的表现比心室导线的平均水平略差,但无统计学意义(P = 0.12)。

结论

(1)美敦力4012导线的表现明显比其他导线差。在心室组中,CPI 4010导线也呈现出类似的趋势;(2)心房导线型号的生存率稳定;(3)对于一些导线,尤其是依赖起搏器的患者,需要频繁随访。

相似文献

1
Pacing lead survival: performance of different models.起搏导线存活率:不同模型的性能
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1992 Nov;15(11 Pt 2):1991-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1992.tb03008.x.
2
Long-term follow-up of pacemaker lead systems: establishment of standards of quality.起搏器导线系统的长期随访:质量标准的建立
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1995 Feb;18(2):271-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1995.tb02517.x.
3
Updated appraisal of pacing lead performance from the Danish Pacemaker Register: the reliability of bipolar pacing leads has improved.丹麦起搏器注册中心对起搏导线性能的最新评估:双极起搏导线的可靠性有所提高。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000 Sep;23(9):1401-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2000.tb00970.x.
4
Clinical routine implantation of a dual chamber pacemaker system designed for safe use with MRI: a single center, retrospective study on lead performance of Medtronic lead 5086MRI in comparison to Medtronic leads 4592-53 and 4092-58.临床常规植入专为与MRI安全配合使用而设计的双腔起搏器系统:一项单中心、关于美敦力5086MRI导线与美敦力4592-53和4092-58导线性能对比的回顾性研究。
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2011 Dec;22(4):233-6, 239-42. doi: 10.1007/s00399-011-0161-y.
5
Chronic steroid-eluting lead performance: a comparison of atrial and ventricular pacing.慢性类固醇洗脱导线性能:心房起搏与心室起搏的比较
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997 Jan;20(1 Pt 1):17-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb04807.x.
6
Comparison of the Medtronic SelectSecure and conventional pacing leads: Long-term follow-up in a multicenter pediatric and congenital cohort.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2019 Mar;42(3):356-365. doi: 10.1111/pace.13614. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
7
Long-term follow up of ventricular endocardial pacing leads. Complications, electrical performance, and longevity of 561 right ventricular leads.心室心内膜起搏导线的长期随访。561根右心室导线的并发症、电性能及使用寿命
Jpn Heart J. 1993 Mar;34(2):193-200. doi: 10.1536/ihj.34.193.
8
Single lead VDD pacing: multicenter study.单导联VDD起搏:多中心研究。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1996 Nov;19(11 Pt 2):1768-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03221.x.
9
Evaluation of an in-line bipolar polyurethane ventricular pacing lead.一种内置式双极聚氨酯心室起搏导线的评估。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1992 Nov;15(11 Pt 2):1982-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1992.tb03006.x.
10
A 12-year experience of bipolar steroid-eluting epicardial pacing leads in children.儿童双极类固醇洗脱心外膜起搏导线的12年经验
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 May;85(5):1704-11. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.02.016.