Suppr超能文献

心力衰竭血运重建试验(HEART):原理、设计与方法

The heart failure revascularisation trial (HEART): rationale, design and methodology.

作者信息

Cleland J G F, Freemantle N, Ball S G, Bonser R S, Camici P, Chattopadhyay S, Dutka D, Eastaugh J, Hampton J, Large S, Norell M S, Pennell D J, Pepper J, Sanda S, Senior R, Smith D

机构信息

Department of Academic Cardiology, Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham, Kingston upon Hull HU16 5JQ, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Heart Fail. 2003 Jun;5(3):295-303. doi: 10.1016/s1388-9842(03)00056-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most patients with heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) secondary to coronary artery disease (CAD) have evidence of myocardium in jeopardy (reversible ischaemia and/or stunning hibernation). It is not known whether revascularisation in such cases is safe or beneficial.

AIMS

To determine whether revascularisation will improve the survival of patients with LVSD and heart failure secondary to CAD and myocardium in jeopardy.

METHODS

This is a randomised controlled trial comparing revascularisation or not, in addition to optimal medical therapy with ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, aldosterone antagonists and an anti-thrombotic agent. Patients must have heart failure requiring treatment with diuretics, a left ventricular ejection fraction <35% and evidence of coronary disease. Myocardial viability and ischaemia are assessed by a broad range of techniques including stress echocardiography and nuclear imaging. All imaging tests are reviewed in core laboratories to ensure uniform reporting. Any conventional revascularisation technique is permitted. The primary outcome measure is all cause mortality. Symptoms, quality of life and health economic issues will also be explored. Assuming an annual mortality of 10% in the control group and allowing for substantial cross-over rates, a study of 800 patients followed for 5 years has 80% power with an alpha of 0.05 (two-sided) to show a 25% reduction in mortality with revascularisation.

RESULTS

At the time of writing 180 patients have been screened for inclusion, 111 have consented to participate and 70 have been randomised. The results of viability testing are awaited in 22 patients. Twenty-six patients had been investigated for myocardial viability and/or by angiography prior to consent, as part of the routine practice in that cardiology department. Of 68 patients who have completed assessment only after consent, 47 (69%) were included. The principal reason for drop-out between consent and randomisation was lack of evidence of myocardial ischaemia or hibernation.

CONCLUSION

The HEART trial will help to determine whether investigation of myocardial ischaemia and/or viability with a view to revascularisation should become part of the routine care of patients with heart failure due to LVSD and CAD.

摘要

背景

大多数因冠状动脉疾病(CAD)继发左心室收缩功能障碍(LVSD)而导致心力衰竭的患者存在心肌受损(可逆性缺血和/或顿抑心肌冬眠)的证据。目前尚不清楚在此类病例中进行血运重建是否安全或有益。

目的

确定血运重建是否能提高CAD继发LVSD且心肌受损的心力衰竭患者的生存率。

方法

这是一项随机对照试验,除使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂、β受体阻滞剂、醛固酮拮抗剂和抗血栓药物进行最佳药物治疗外,还比较是否进行血运重建。患者必须患有需要使用利尿剂治疗的心力衰竭、左心室射血分数<35%且有冠状动脉疾病的证据。通过包括负荷超声心动图和核成像在内的多种技术评估心肌活力和缺血情况。所有影像学检查均在核心实验室进行复查,以确保报告的一致性。允许使用任何传统的血运重建技术。主要结局指标是全因死亡率。还将探讨症状、生活质量和卫生经济问题。假设对照组的年死亡率为10%,并考虑到较高的交叉率,一项对800例患者进行5年随访的研究在α为0.05(双侧)时具有80%的检验效能,以显示血运重建可使死亡率降低25%。

结果

在撰写本文时,已有180例患者被筛查是否符合纳入标准,111例同意参与,70例已被随机分组。22例患者的活力检测结果尚待确定。作为该心脏病学部门的常规做法,在26例患者同意之前,已对其进行了心肌活力和/或血管造影检查。在68例仅在同意后完成评估的患者中,47例(69%)被纳入。同意与随机分组之间退出的主要原因是缺乏心肌缺血或冬眠的证据。

结论

HEART试验将有助于确定针对心肌缺血和/或活力进行评估以进行血运重建是否应成为LVSD和CAD所致心力衰竭患者常规治疗的一部分。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验