Burton Wayne N, Morrison Alan, Wertheimer Albert I
Bank One Corporation, Chicago, Illinois 60670-0006, USA.
J Occup Environ Med. 2003 Jun;45(6):610-21. doi: 10.1097/01.jom.0000069244.06498.01.
Many chronic illnesses that affect the working population can cause losses in productivity. The extent to which these productivity losses can be reduced by pharmacological treatment is of particular interest to employers, who bear the productivity costs and subsidize the cost of employees' health care. In the past several years, the effects of pharmaceuticals on productivity losses have been tested in numerous studies, including randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. In this article, we summarize and critically review these studies and, where appropriate, provide quantitative overviews. The evidence is very good for about a dozen drug classes that pharmaceuticals reduce productivity losses caused by respiratory illnesses (ie, asthma, allergic disorders, bronchitis, upper respiratory infections, and influenza) diabetes, depression, dysmenorrhea, and migraine. We also discuss the calculation of productivity costs, reductions in which may partially or completely offset the costs of treatment. This information should be helpful to occupational physicians who are increasingly providing recommendations on employer benefit plan designs and pharmaceutical benefits.
许多影响劳动人口的慢性疾病会导致生产力损失。雇主们尤其关注通过药物治疗能在多大程度上减少这些生产力损失,因为他们承担着生产力成本,并补贴员工的医疗保健费用。在过去几年里,药物对生产力损失的影响已在众多研究中得到检验,包括随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。在本文中,我们总结并批判性地回顾了这些研究,并在适当的地方提供了定量概述。对于大约十二类药物,有充分证据表明药物可减少由呼吸道疾病(如哮喘、过敏性疾病、支气管炎、上呼吸道感染和流感)、糖尿病、抑郁症、痛经和偏头痛导致的生产力损失。我们还讨论了生产力成本的计算,生产力成本的降低可能部分或完全抵消治疗成本。这些信息应有助于职业医师,他们越来越多地就雇主福利计划设计和药物福利提供建议。