Lensberg Benedikte R, Drummond Michael F, Danchenko Natalya, Despiégel Nicolas, François Clément
Optuminsight, Uxbridge, UK.
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2013 Nov 18;5:565-73. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S44866. eCollection 2013.
Lost productivity is often excluded from economic evaluations, which may lead to an underestimation of the societal benefits of treatment. However, there are multiple challenges in reliably estimating and reporting productivity losses. This article explores the main challenges, ie, selecting an appropriate valuation method (ie, human capital, friction cost, or multiplier), avoiding double counting, and accounting for equity. It also discusses the use of presenteeism instruments and their application in clinical trials, with a specific focus on their relevance in individuals with mood disorders. Further research and discussion is required on the development of reliable techniques for measuring and valuing productivity changes due to presenteeism.
生产力损失通常被排除在经济评估之外,这可能导致对治疗的社会效益估计不足。然而,在可靠地估计和报告生产力损失方面存在多重挑战。本文探讨了主要挑战,即选择合适的估值方法(即人力资本法、摩擦成本法或乘数法)、避免重复计算以及考虑公平性。本文还讨论了出勤主义衡量工具及其在临床试验中的应用,特别关注其在情绪障碍患者中的相关性。关于开发可靠技术以测量和评估因出勤主义导致的生产力变化,还需要进一步的研究和讨论。