Gokhale Leena, Sturdee David W, Parsons Anthony D
Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, Devon, UK.
J Br Menopause Soc. 2003 Mar;9(1):32-5. doi: 10.1258/136218003100321991.
To estimate the extent of use of over the counter food supplements in women attending menopause clinics in the West Midlands.
Questionnaire survey of women attending menopause clinics in Solihull Hospital, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Rugby and Walsgrave Hospitals and Birmingham Women's Hospital.
Type and rate of use of food supplements in hormone replacement therapy (HRT) users and nonusers and perceived benefits.
Three hundred and forty women completed the questionnaire. 95% (n = 326) belonged to the white European ethnic group. The median age was 53 years, with 50% (n = 170) in the 50-59 years age group, and 30 % (n = 95) in the age range 40-49 years. Overall use of over the counter supplements in the clinic was 43% (n = 147), with Oil of Evening Primrose (53%) and vitamins (44%) being the most commonly used preparations. 71% (n = 242) women were users of conventional HRT. Of these, 46% were also using food supplements. The use of food supplements was higher amongst HRT users (46%) as compared to non-HRT users (32%). The use was similar between smokers and non-smokers. The most commonly perceived benefit was a feeling of well-being, 39% (n = 58/147). The proportionate use was highest in social class I and class II (51% and 54% respectively), in keeping with amount of disposable income. Friends (27%), the internet (26%) and magazines (20%) were the most commonly quoted sources of information. 79% (n = 116/147) were spending up to 10 each month on alternative remedies. 10% (n = 14/147) of women were visiting practitioners of alternative remedies.
The use of food supplements is widespread and particularly in those already taking conventional HRT. This study was not designed to test confidence in orthodox medicine, but the prevalence of use of supplements amongst menopausal women attending menopause clinics. The most commonly perceived benefit is a feeling of well-being, but users of food supplements are unsure of any additional benefit when supplements are taken in conjunction with conventional therapy. There is a misapprehension that "herbal" or "natural" equals safe. In addition, the correlation between supplement use and side effects is very seldom made, as these compounds are mistakenly considered almost universally safe, and physicians often fail to enquire about their use in routine history taking.
评估西米德兰兹地区就诊于更年期诊所的女性使用非处方食品补充剂的情况。
对就诊于索利赫尔医院、伯明翰心脏地带医院、拉格比和沃尔格雷夫医院以及伯明翰妇女医院更年期诊所的女性进行问卷调查。
激素替代疗法(HRT)使用者和非使用者中食品补充剂的使用类型和比例,以及感知到的益处。
340名女性完成了问卷。95%(n = 326)属于欧洲白人族裔。中位年龄为53岁,50%(n = 170)在50 - 59岁年龄组,30%(n = 95)在40 - 49岁年龄范围。诊所中非处方补充剂的总体使用率为43%(n = 147),月见草油(53%)和维生素(44%)是最常用的制剂。71%(n = 242)的女性使用传统HRT。其中,46%也在使用食品补充剂。与非HRT使用者(32%)相比,HRT使用者中食品补充剂的使用率更高。吸烟者和非吸烟者之间的使用率相似。最常被感知到的益处是感觉良好,占39%(n = 58/147)。在社会阶层I和阶层II中使用率最高(分别为51%和54%),与可支配收入水平相符。朋友(27%)、互联网(26%)和杂志(20%)是最常被提及的信息来源。79%(n = 116/147)的人每月在替代疗法上花费不超过10英镑。10%(n = 14/147)的女性会拜访替代疗法从业者。
食品补充剂的使用很普遍,尤其是在那些已经在服用传统HRT的女性中。本研究并非旨在测试对正统医学的信心,而是更年期诊所中更年期女性补充剂的使用 prevalence。最常被感知到的益处是感觉良好,但食品补充剂使用者不确定在与传统疗法联合使用时是否有任何额外益处。存在一种误解,认为“草药”或“天然”就等于安全。此外,很少有人将补充剂的使用与副作用联系起来,因为这些化合物被错误地认为几乎普遍安全,而且医生在常规病史询问中往往不询问其使用情况。