Wilcken N, Hornbuckle J, Ghersi D
Department of Medical Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2003(2):CD002747. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002747.
Both chemotherapy and endocrine therapy can be used as treatments for metastatic breast cancer.
To review the evidence and determine whether chemotherapy or endocrine therapy has the most beneficial effect on treatment outcomes (survival, response rate, toxicity and quality of life).
The specialised register maintained by the Editorial Base of the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group was searched on 16th September 2002 using the codes for "advanced breast cancer", "chemotherapy" and "endocrine therapy". Details of the search strategy applied by the Group to create the register, and the procedure used to code references, are described in the Group's module on the Cochrane Library.
Randomised trials comparing the effects of chemotherapy alone with endocrine therapy alone on pre-specified endpoints in metastatic breast cancer.
Data were collected from published trials. Hazard ratios were derived for survival analysis and a fixed effect model was used for meta-analysis. Response rates were analysed as dichotomous variables. Toxicity and quality of life data were extracted where present.
The primary analysis of overall effect using hazard ratios derived from published survival curves involved six trials (692 women). There was no significant difference seen (HR=0.94, 95%CI 0.79-1.12, p=0.5). A test for heterogeneity was p=0.1. A pooled estimate of reported response rates in eight trials involving 817 women shows a significant advantage for chemotherapy over endocrine therapy with RR=1.25 (1.01-1.54, p=0.04). However the two largest trials showed trends in opposite directions, and a test for heterogeneity was p=0.0018. There was little information available on toxicity and quality of life. Six of the seven fully published trials commented on increased toxicity with chemotherapy, mentioning nausea, vomiting and alopecia. Three of the seven mentioned aspects of quality of life, with differing results. Only one trial formally measured quality of life, concluding that it was better with chemotherapy.
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: In women with metastatic breast cancer and where hormone receptors are present, a policy of treating first with endocrine therapy rather than chemotherapy is recommended except in the presence of rapidly progressive disease.
化疗和内分泌治疗均可用于转移性乳腺癌的治疗。
回顾相关证据,确定化疗或内分泌治疗对治疗结局(生存率、缓解率、毒性和生活质量)是否具有最有益的效果。
2002年9月16日,使用“晚期乳腺癌”“化疗”和“内分泌治疗”的代码,检索了Cochrane乳腺癌协作组编辑基地维护的专业注册库。该协作组用于创建注册库的检索策略细节以及用于为参考文献编码的程序,在该协作组关于Cochrane图书馆的模块中有描述。
比较单纯化疗与单纯内分泌治疗对转移性乳腺癌预先设定终点的影响的随机试验。
从已发表的试验中收集数据。计算风险比用于生存分析,并使用固定效应模型进行荟萃分析。缓解率作为二分变量进行分析。如有毒性和生活质量数据则进行提取。
使用从已发表生存曲线得出的风险比进行的总体效应的初步分析涉及6项试验(692名女性)。未观察到显著差异(风险比=0.94,95%可信区间0.79 - 1.12,p = 0.5)。异质性检验p = 0.1。对涉及817名女性的8项试验中报告的缓解率进行的汇总估计显示,化疗相对于内分泌治疗具有显著优势,风险比=1.25(1.01 - 1.54,p = 0.04)。然而,两项最大规模的试验显示出相反方向的趋势,异质性检验p = 0.0018。关于毒性和生活质量的信息很少。7项完全发表的试验中有6项评论了化疗导致的毒性增加,提及恶心、呕吐和脱发。7项试验中有3项提到了生活质量方面,结果各异。只有1项试验正式测量了生活质量,得出化疗时生活质量更好的结论。
对于存在激素受体的转移性乳腺癌女性,除疾病快速进展外,建议首先采用内分泌治疗而非化疗的策略。