Chen W, Liu J, Gluud C
Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group, Copenhagen Trial Unit, H:S Rigshospitalet, Dept. 7102, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(2):CD003181. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003181.
The viral hepatitides are common causes of liver diseases globally. Trials have assessed bile acids for patients with viral hepatitis, but no consensus was reached regarding their usefulness.
To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of bile acids for viral hepatitis.
Searches were performed of the trial registers of The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group (September 2002), The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2002), MEDLINE (September 2002), EMBASE (September 2002), and The Chinese Biomedical Database (April 2001).
Randomised clinical trials comparing any dose or duration of bile acids versus placebo or no intervention for viral hepatitis were included, irrespective of language, publication status, or blinding.
Two reviewers extracted the data independently. The methodological quality of the trials was evaluated with respect to generation of the allocation sequence, allocation concealment, double blinding, and follow-up. The outcomes were presented as relative risks (RR) or weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
We identified 27 randomised trials of bile acids for hepatitis B or C; none were of high methodological quality. In one trial, ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) versus placebo for acute hepatitis B significantly reduced the risk of hepatitis B surface antigen positivity at the end of treatment and serum HBV DNA level at the end of follow-up. In another trial, UDCA versus no intervention for chronic hepatitis B significantly reduced the risk of having abnormal serum transaminase activities at the end of treatment. Twenty-five trials compared bile acids (21 trials UDCA; four trials tauro-UDCA) versus placebo or no intervention with or without co-interventions for chronic hepatitis C. Bile acids did not significantly reduce the risk of having detectable serum HCV RNA (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.07), cirrhosis, or portal and periportal inflammation score at the end of treatment. Bile acids significantly decreased the risk of having abnormal serum alanine aminotransferase activity at the end of treatment (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.90) and follow-up (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.98). Bile acids significantly increased the Knodell score (WMD 0.20, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.31) at the end of treatment. No severe adverse events were reported. We did not identify trials including patients with hepatitis A, acute C, D, or E.
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Bile acids lead to a significant improvement in serum transaminase activities in hepatitis B and C. There is insufficient evidence either to support or to refute effects on viral markers, mortality, incidence of cirrhosis, or liver histology. Trials with high methodological quality are required.
病毒性肝炎是全球肝脏疾病的常见病因。已有试验对病毒性肝炎患者使用胆汁酸进行了评估,但关于其有效性尚未达成共识。
评估胆汁酸对病毒性肝炎的有益和有害影响。
检索了Cochrane肝胆组试验注册库(2002年9月)、Cochrane图书馆(2002年第2期)、MEDLINE(2002年9月)、EMBASE(2002年9月)和中国生物医学数据库(2001年4月)。
纳入比较任何剂量或疗程的胆汁酸与安慰剂或未进行干预治疗病毒性肝炎的随机临床试验,无论语言、发表状态或是否采用盲法。
两名评价员独立提取数据。根据分配序列的产生、分配隐藏、双盲和随访情况对试验的方法学质量进行评估。结果以相对危险度(RR)或加权均数差(WMD)及95%置信区间(CI)表示。
我们确定了27项关于胆汁酸治疗乙型或丙型肝炎的随机试验;均未达到高方法学质量。在一项试验中,熊去氧胆酸(UDCA)与安慰剂治疗急性乙型肝炎相比,显著降低了治疗结束时乙肝表面抗原阳性的风险以及随访结束时血清HBV DNA水平。在另一项试验中,UDCA与未干预治疗慢性乙型肝炎相比,显著降低了治疗结束时血清转氨酶活性异常的风险。25项试验比较了胆汁酸(21项试验用UDCA;4项试验用牛磺熊去氧胆酸)与安慰剂或未进行干预,同时或不同时进行联合干预治疗慢性丙型肝炎。胆汁酸未显著降低治疗结束时血清HCV RNA可检测、肝硬化或门脉及门脉周围炎症评分的风险(RR 0.99,95%CI 0.91至1.07)。胆汁酸显著降低了治疗结束时(RR 0.82,95%CI 0.76至0.90)和随访时(RR 0.91,95%CI 0.85至0.98)血清丙氨酸转氨酶活性异常的风险。胆汁酸显著增加了治疗结束时的Knodell评分(WMD 0.20,95%CI 0.08至0.31)。未报告严重不良事件。我们未找到纳入甲型、急性丙型、丁型或戊型肝炎患者的试验。
胆汁酸可使乙型和丙型肝炎患者的血清转氨酶活性显著改善。关于对病毒标志物、死亡率、肝硬化发生率或肝脏组织学的影响,既没有足够的证据支持也没有足够的证据反驳。需要进行高方法学质量的试验。