Suppr超能文献

用于原发性硬化性胆管炎的胆汁酸

Bile acids for primary sclerosing cholangitis.

作者信息

Chen W, Gluud C

机构信息

The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group, Copenhagen Trial Unit, H:S Rigshospitalet, Dept. 7102, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(2):CD003626. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003626.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bile acids have been used for treating primary sclerosing cholangitis, but their beneficial and harmful effects remain unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of bile acids for patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group's Trials Register, The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and The Chinese Biomedical Database generally from inception through to May 2002.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials comparing any dose or duration of bile acids versus placebo, no intervention, or another intervention were included. Trials were included irrespective of blinding, language, or publication status.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers extracted the data. The methodological quality of the trials was evaluated with respect to the generation of the allocation sequence, allocation concealment, double blinding, and follow-up. The results were reported by intention-to-treat analysis. The outcomes were presented as relative risks (RR) or weighted mean differences (WMD), both with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

We identified six randomised clinical trials, all with low methodological quality. Patients were treated for three months to six years (median two years). Five trials (183 patients) compared ursodeoxycholic acid versus placebo, and one trial (40 patients) compared ursodeoxycholic acid versus no treatment. Ursodeoxycholic acid did not significantly reduce the risk of death (RR 0.86; 95% CI 0.27 to 2.73); treatment failure including liver transplantation, varices, ascites, and encephalopathy (RR 0.94; 95% CI 0.63 to 1.42); liver histological deterioration (RR 0.89; 95% CI 0.45 to 1.74); or liver cholangiographic deterioration (RR 0.43; 95% CI 0.18 to 1.02). Ursodeoxycholic acid significantly improved serum bilirubin (WMD -14.6 micro mol/litre; 95% CI -18.7 to -10.6), alkaline phosphatases (WMD -506 IU/litre; 95% CI -583 to -430), aspartate aminotransferase (WMD -46 IU/litre; 95% CI -77 to -16), and gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase (WMD -260 IU/litre; 95% CI -315 to -205), but not albumin (WMD -0.20 g/litre; 95% CI -1.91 to 1.50). Ursodeoxycholic acid was well tolerated.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Ursodeoxycholic acid leads to a significant improvement in liver biochemistry, but there is insufficient evidence to either support or refute its clinical effects in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Large scale, high-quality randomised clinical trials are needed.

摘要

背景

胆汁酸已被用于治疗原发性硬化性胆管炎,但其有益和有害作用仍不明确。

目的

评估胆汁酸对原发性硬化性胆管炎患者的有益和有害作用。

检索策略

我们检索了Cochrane肝胆组试验注册库、Cochrane图书馆、MEDLINE、EMBASE和中国生物医学数据库,检索时间一般从创建至2002年5月。

选择标准

纳入比较任何剂量或疗程的胆汁酸与安慰剂、无干预措施或其他干预措施的随机临床试验。无论是否采用盲法、语言或发表状态,均纳入试验。

数据收集与分析

两名评价者提取数据。根据分配序列的产生、分配隐藏、双盲和随访情况评估试验的方法学质量。结果采用意向性分析报告。结果以相对危险度(RR)或加权均数差(WMD)表示,并给出95%置信区间(CI)。

主要结果

我们确定了6项随机临床试验,所有试验的方法学质量均较低。患者接受治疗3个月至6年(中位时间为2年)。5项试验(183例患者)比较了熊去氧胆酸与安慰剂,1项试验(40例患者)比较了熊去氧胆酸与未治疗。熊去氧胆酸未显著降低死亡风险(RR 0.86;95%CI 0.27至2.73);治疗失败包括肝移植、静脉曲张、腹水和肝性脑病(RR 0.94;95%CI 0.63至1.42);肝脏组织学恶化(RR 0.89;95%CI 0.45至1.74);或肝脏胆管造影恶化(RR 0.43;95%CI 0.18至1.02)。熊去氧胆酸显著改善了血清胆红素(WMD -14.6微摩尔/升;95%CI -18.7至-10.6)、碱性磷酸酶(WMD -506国际单位/升;95%CI -583至-430)、天冬氨酸转氨酶(WMD -46国际单位/升;95%CI -77至-16)和γ-谷氨酰转肽酶(WMD -260国际单位/升;95%CI -315至-205),但未改善白蛋白(WMD -0.20克/升;95%CI -1.91至1.50)。熊去氧胆酸耐受性良好。

评价者结论

熊去氧胆酸可显著改善肝脏生化指标,但尚无足够证据支持或反驳其对原发性硬化性胆管炎患者的临床疗效。需要开展大规模、高质量的随机临床试验。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验