Alderdice F, McKenna D, Dornan J
School of Nursing and Midwifery, The Queens University of Belfast, Royal Maternity Hospital, Institute of Clinical Science, Belfast, Northern Ireland, Ireland, BT12 6BJ.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(2):CD003577. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003577.
Caesarean section is a common operation with no agreed standard on operative techniques and materials to use. The skin layer can be repaired by sub cuticular stitch immediately below the skin layer, an interrupted stitch or with skin staples. A great variety of materials and techniques are used for skin closure after caesarean section and there is a need to identify which provide the best outcomes for women.
To compare the effects of skin closure techniques and materials on maternal outcomes and time taken to perform a caesarean section.
We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register (August 2002).
All randomised comparisons of skin closure techniques in caesarean section.
Three papers were identified from the search. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers. On further inspection two were not considered to be randomised controlled trials.
Only one small randomised controlled trial, involving 66 women, was included in the review. Frishman et al compared staples with absorbable sub-cuticular suture for closure following caesarean section. While operating time was significantly shorter when using staples, the use of absorbable sub cuticular suture resulted in less postoperative pain and yielded a better cosmetic result at the post-operative visit.
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There is no conclusive evidence about how the skin should be closed after caesarean section. Questions regarding the best closure technique and material and the outcomes associated with each remain unanswered. The appearance and strength of the scar following caesarean section is important to women and the choice of technique and materials should be made by women in consultation with their obstetrician based on the limited information currently available.
剖宫产是一种常见手术,在手术技术和使用材料方面尚无公认标准。皮肤层可通过在皮肤层正下方进行皮下缝合、间断缝合或使用皮肤吻合钉进行修复。剖宫产术后皮肤缝合使用了各种各样的材料和技术,有必要确定哪种对女性效果最佳。
比较皮肤缝合技术和材料对产妇结局及剖宫产手术时间的影响。
我们检索了Cochrane妊娠与分娩组试验注册库(2002年8月)。
剖宫产中皮肤缝合技术的所有随机对照比较。
检索中识别出3篇论文。两名评价员独立提取数据。经进一步检查,其中2篇不被认为是随机对照试验。
该评价仅纳入了一项小型随机对照试验,涉及66名女性。弗里什曼等人比较了剖宫产术后使用吻合钉与可吸收皮下缝线进行缝合的效果。虽然使用吻合钉时手术时间明显更短,但使用可吸收皮下缝线术后疼痛较轻,术后随访时美容效果更好。
关于剖宫产术后皮肤应如何缝合,尚无确凿证据。关于最佳缝合技术和材料以及与之相关的结局的问题仍未得到解答。剖宫产术后疤痕的外观和强度对女性很重要,技术和材料的选择应由女性在与产科医生协商后,根据目前有限的信息做出。