Katzenschlager R, Sampaio C, Costa J, Lees A
National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, Box 149, London, UK, WC1 N 3BG.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2002(2):CD003735. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003735.
Anticholinergics were the first drugs available for the symptomatic treatment of Parkinson's disease and they are still widely used today, both as monotherapy and as part of combination regimes. They are commonly believed to be associated with a less favourable side effect profile than other antiparkinsonian drugs, in particular with respect to neuropsychiatric and cognitive adverse events. They have been claimed to exert a better effect on tremor than on other parkinsonian features.
To determine the efficacy and tolerability of anticholinergics in the symptomatic treatment of Parkinson's disease compared to placebo or no treatment.
The literature search included electronic searches of the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2001), MEDLINE (1966 to 2001), Old Medline (1960-1965), Index Medicus (1927 - 1959), as well as handsearching the neurology literature including the reference lists of identified articles, other reviews and book chapters.
Randomised controlled trials of anticholinergic drugs versus placebo or no treatment in de-novo or advanced Parkinson's disease, either as monotherapy or as an add-on to other antiparkinsonian drugs were included. Trials of anticholinergic drugs that were never in general clinical use were excluded.
Data was abstracted independently by two authors. Differences were settled by discussion among all authors. Data collected included patient characteristics, disease duration and severity, concomitant medication, interventions including duration and dose of anticholinergic treatment, outcome measures, rates of and reasons for withdrawals, and neuropsychiatric and cognitive adverse events.
The initial search yielded 14 potentially eligible studies, five of which were subsequently excluded. In three cases this was because they dealt with substances that had never been marketed or had not been licensed for as far as could be traced back. One trial had been published twice in different languages. One study was excluded based on the assessment of its methodological quality. The remaining nine studies were all of double-blind cross-over design and included 221 patients. Trial duration was between five and 20 weeks and drugs investigated were benzhexol (mean doses: 8 to 20 mg/d), orphenadrine (mean dose not reported), benztropine (mean dose not reported), bornaprine (8 to 8.25 mg/d), benapryzine (200 mg/d), and methixine (45 mg/d). Only one study involved two anticholinergic drugs. Outcome measures varied widely across studies and in many cases, the scales applied were the authors' own and were not defined in detail. Incomplete reporting of methodology and results was frequent. The heterogeneous study designs as well as incomplete reporting precluded combined statistical analysis. Five studies used both tremor and other parkinsonian features as outcome measures. Outcome measures in these five studies were too different for a combined analysis and results varied widely, from a significant improvement in tremor only to significant improvement in other features but not in tremor. All studies except one (dealing with methixine) found a significant improvement from baseline on the anticholinergic drug in at least one outcome measure. The difference between placebo and active drug was reported in four studies and was found to be significant in all cases. No study failed to show superiority of the anticholinergic over placebo. The occurrence of neuropsychiatric and cognitive adverse events was reported in all but three studies (in 35 patients on active drug versus 13 on placebo). The most frequently reported reason for drop-outs from studies was in patients on placebo due to withdrawal from pre-trial anticholinergic treatment.
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: As monotherapy or as an adjunct to other antiparkinsonian drugs, anticholinergics are more effective than placebo in improving motor function in Parkinson's disease. Neuropsychiatric and cognitive adverse events occur more frequently on anticholinergics than on placebo and are a more common reason for withdrawal than lack of efficacy. Results regarding a potentially better effect of the anticholinergic drug on tremor than on other outcome measures are conflicting and data do not strongly support a differential clinical effect on individual parkinsonian features. Data is insufficient to allow comparisons in efficacy or tolerability between individual anticholinergic drugs.
抗胆碱能药物是最早用于帕金森病症状治疗的药物,至今仍被广泛使用,既可用作单一疗法,也可作为联合治疗方案的一部分。人们普遍认为,与其他抗帕金森病药物相比,它们的副作用较小,尤其是在神经精神和认知不良事件方面。据称,它们对震颤的疗效比对其他帕金森病症状的疗效更好。
确定与安慰剂或不治疗相比,抗胆碱能药物在帕金森病症状治疗中的疗效和耐受性。
文献检索包括对Cochrane对照试验注册库(《Cochrane图书馆》,2001年第4期)、MEDLINE(1966年至2001年)、旧MEDLINE(1960 - 1965年)、《医学索引》(1927 - 1959年)进行电子检索,以及人工检索神经学文献,包括已识别文章的参考文献列表、其他综述和书籍章节。
纳入抗胆碱能药物与安慰剂或不治疗在初发或晚期帕金森病中作为单一疗法或作为其他抗帕金森病药物附加治疗的随机对照试验。排除从未在一般临床中使用过的抗胆碱能药物试验。
由两位作者独立提取数据。差异通过所有作者的讨论解决。收集的数据包括患者特征、疾病持续时间和严重程度、伴随用药、干预措施(包括抗胆碱能治疗的持续时间和剂量)、结局指标、退出率和原因,以及神经精神和认知不良事件。
初步检索产生了14项潜在符合条件的研究,其中5项随后被排除。在3个案例中,这是因为它们涉及从未上市或据追溯未获许可的物质。一项试验以不同语言发表了两次。一项研究根据其方法学质量评估被排除。其余9项研究均为双盲交叉设计,包括221名患者。试验持续时间为5至20周,研究的药物有苯海索(平均剂量:8至20毫克/天)、奥芬那君(未报告平均剂量)、苄托品(未报告平均剂量)、波那普明(8至8.25毫克/天)、贝那替秦(200毫克/天)和甲磺酸苯扎托品(45毫克/天)。只有一项研究涉及两种抗胆碱能药物。各研究的结局指标差异很大,在许多情况下,所应用的量表是作者自己设计的,未详细定义。方法学和结果的报告不完整很常见。异质性的研究设计以及报告不完整妨碍了联合统计分析。5项研究将震颤和其他帕金森病症状作为结局指标。这5项研究的结局指标差异太大,无法进行联合分析,结果差异很大,从仅震颤有显著改善到其他症状有显著改善但震颤无改善。除一项研究(涉及甲磺酸苯扎托品)外,所有研究均发现抗胆碱能药物在至少一项结局指标上与基线相比有显著改善。4项研究报告了安慰剂与活性药物之间的差异,在所有情况下均发现有显著差异。没有研究未能显示抗胆碱能药物优于安慰剂。除3项研究外,所有研究均报告了神经精神和认知不良事件的发生情况(35名服用活性药物的患者与13名服用安慰剂的患者)。研究中最常报告的退出原因是服用安慰剂的患者因停用试验前的抗胆碱能治疗。
作为单一疗法或作为其他抗帕金森病药物的辅助治疗,抗胆碱能药物在改善帕金森病运动功能方面比安慰剂更有效。抗胆碱能药物比安慰剂更频繁地出现神经精神和认知不良事件,并且是比缺乏疗效更常见的退出原因。关于抗胆碱能药物对震颤的疗效可能比对其他结局指标更好的结果存在矛盾,数据并不强烈支持对个体帕金森病症状有不同的临床效果。数据不足以对个体抗胆碱能药物的疗效或耐受性进行比较。