Benton Michael J, Ayala Francisco J
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1RJ, UK.
Science. 2003 Jun 13;300(5626):1698-700. doi: 10.1126/science.1077795.
The relative merits of molecular and paleontological dates of major branching points in the tree of life are currently debated. In some cases, molecular date estimates are up to twice as old as paleontological dates. However, although it is true that paleontological dates are often too young (missing fossils), molecular dates are often too old (statistical bias). Intense study of the dating of major splits in the tree of mammals has shown rapprochement as fossil dates become older and molecular dates become younger.
生命之树主要分支点的分子年代和古生物学年代的相对优点目前存在争议。在某些情况下,分子年代估计比古生物学年代老两倍之多。然而,尽管古生物学年代常常过年轻(化石缺失)这一点没错,但分子年代也常常过老(统计偏差)。对哺乳动物进化树主要分支年代测定的深入研究表明,随着化石年代变老而分子年代变年轻,两者正趋于一致。