Laurell K, Larsson B, Eeg-Olofsson O
Department of Neuroscience, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Cephalalgia. 2003 Jul;23(6):420-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.2003.00540.x.
The level of agreement between different sources of information, i.e. questionnaires, interviews and diaries, was evaluated in a sample of 129 schoolchildren, 69 girls and 60 boys, ranging in age from 7 to 17 years. Headache diagnoses and headache features showed high agreement between questionnaires and subsequent interviews. The concordance between questionnaires and interviews for headache diagnoses increased, and the number of unclassified headaches decreased, when the International Headache Society (IHS) duration criterion was excluded. When comparing headache frequency reported in questionnaires and interviews with diary recordings, the agreement was low and the frequency higher in the diaries. Overall, the agreement between questionnaires, interviews and diaries was not related to age or gender. The questionnaire may serve as a valid source of information in studies of headache in schoolchildren. Prospective recordings in diaries provide additional information, in particular of low-intensity headache. In children, the IHS duration criterion should be modified or excluded.
在129名年龄在7至17岁之间的学童样本中(69名女孩和60名男孩),对不同信息来源(即问卷、访谈和日记)之间的一致性水平进行了评估。头痛诊断和头痛特征在问卷与随后的访谈之间显示出高度一致性。当排除国际头痛协会(IHS)的持续时间标准时,问卷与访谈之间头痛诊断的一致性增加,未分类头痛的数量减少。当比较问卷和访谈中报告的头痛频率与日记记录时,一致性较低,且日记中的频率更高。总体而言,问卷、访谈和日记之间的一致性与年龄或性别无关。问卷可作为学童头痛研究中有效的信息来源。日记中的前瞻性记录提供了额外信息,特别是关于低强度头痛的信息。在儿童中,IHS持续时间标准应进行修改或排除。