Krogh Anne-Berit, Larsson Bo, Salvesen Øyvind, Linde Mattias
Department of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7489, Trondheim, Norway.
Faculty of Health and Social Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
J Headache Pain. 2016;17:14. doi: 10.1186/s10194-016-0602-4. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
Reliable information on headache characteristics, including frequency and intensity, headache-associated impairment, and use of analgesic medications, may depend on the assessment method used. This study analyzed the correlations between headache characteristics determined in structured interviews and those determined in prospective diary recordings kept by adolescents in the general population.
In this cross-sectional school-based study, a representative sample of 488 adolescents aged 12-18 years were interviewed about headaches experienced during the previous year. Headache diaries for a three-week period were kept by 393 participants: 244 girls (62 %) and 149 (38 %) boys.
Most adolescents (88 %) who reported headaches during their interview also recorded headaches in their diary. In contrast, 51 % of those who reported being headache-free during the last year recorded headaches in their diary. In the interviews, frequent headaches (at least 50 % of days during the last year) were reported by 2.9 % of participants, while 25.5 % reported this headache frequency in their diary. Overall, the ratings of headache frequency were significantly higher in diaries than in interviews (p < 0.001). Significant but low correlations were observed between intensity levels reported retrospectively and prospectively (rho = 0.28; p < 0.001) and between average scores of headache-related impairment reported retrospectively and prospectively (rho = 0.35; p < 0.001). The use of medications by those who reported one or more current headache disorder during their interview was significantly lower in prospective recordings than in the retrospective interview estimates (p < 0.001).
There is inconsistency in the estimates of headache characteristics between retrospective reports and diary recordings. A comprehensive picture of headache complaints among adolescents may be better obtained through a combination of prospective diary recordings and interviews by school health and clinical services.
关于头痛特征(包括频率和强度)、头痛相关损害以及止痛药物使用的可靠信息可能取决于所采用的评估方法。本研究分析了在结构化访谈中确定的头痛特征与普通人群中青少年前瞻性日记记录中确定的头痛特征之间的相关性。
在这项基于学校的横断面研究中,对488名12至18岁的青少年进行了访谈,询问他们上一年经历的头痛情况。393名参与者记录了为期三周的头痛日记:244名女孩(62%)和149名男孩(38%)。
在访谈中报告有头痛的大多数青少年(88%)也在日记中记录了头痛情况。相比之下,去年报告无头痛的青少年中有51%在日记中记录了头痛情况。在访谈中,2.9%的参与者报告有频繁头痛(去年至少有半数天数头痛),而在日记中报告此头痛频率的为25.5%。总体而言,日记中头痛频率的评分显著高于访谈中的评分(p<0.001)。回顾性和前瞻性报告的强度水平之间观察到显著但较低的相关性(rho=0.28;p<0.001),回顾性和前瞻性报告的头痛相关损害平均得分之间也观察到显著但较低的相关性(rho=0.35;p<0.001)。在访谈中报告有一种或多种当前头痛障碍的人在前瞻性记录中使用药物的情况显著低于回顾性访谈估计值(p<0.001)。
回顾性报告和日记记录之间对头痛特征的估计存在不一致。通过学校健康和临床服务部门进行的前瞻性日记记录和访谈相结合,可能会更好地全面了解青少年的头痛主诉。