Osman Augustine, Barrios Francisco X, Gutierrez Peter M, Kopper Beverly A, Butler Adam, Bagge Courtney L
University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls 50614-0505, USA.
J Clin Psychol. 2003 Jul;59(7):767-85. doi: 10.1002/jclp.10173.
A new 26-item self-report measure, the Pain Distress Inventory (PDI), was designed to assess affective distress symptoms related to physical pain. Phases 1 to 3 were designed to construct the PDI using contemporary test development strategies. Studies 1 and 2 were conducted to define and confirm the four-factor oblique structure of the PDI: PDI-Depression, PDI-Anger, PDI-Pain Sensitivity, and PDI-Somatic Anxiety. The internal consistency reliability estimates were high for both the PDI total and scale scores. Study 3 examined relationships of the PDI with demographic variables and pain- and psychological-related responses. Scores on the PDI were useful in predicting scores on a pain-interference index and a pain-symptom index. Study 4 was designed to replicate previous findings of reliability and validity. The PDI total and scale scores were useful in differentiating between the responses of the clinic and nonclinic study participants. Limitations and potential uses of the PDI are discussed.
一种新的包含26个条目的自我报告测量工具——疼痛困扰量表（PDI），旨在评估与身体疼痛相关的情感困扰症状。第1阶段至第3阶段旨在运用当代测试开发策略构建PDI。开展了研究1和研究2来定义并确认PDI的四因素斜交结构：PDI-抑郁、PDI-愤怒、PDI-疼痛敏感性和PDI-躯体焦虑。PDI总分及各分量表得分的内部一致性信度估计值都很高。研究3考察了PDI与人口统计学变量以及与疼痛和心理相关反应之间的关系。PDI得分有助于预测疼痛干扰指数和疼痛症状指数的得分。研究4旨在重复先前关于信度和效度的研究结果。PDI总分及各分量表得分有助于区分临床研究参与者和非临床研究参与者的反应。文中讨论了PDI的局限性和潜在用途。
