Suppr超能文献

临床环境中邻苯二甲醛用于内镜消毒:与戊二醛相比的再处理时间和成本评估

Endoscope disinfection by ortho-phthalaldehyde in a clinical setting: an evaluation of reprocessing time and costs compared with glutaraldehyde.

作者信息

Hession Sandra M

机构信息

Endoscopy Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.

出版信息

Gastroenterol Nurs. 2003 May-Jun;26(3):110-4. doi: 10.1097/00001610-200305000-00005.

Abstract

Ortho-phthalaldehyde provides high-level disinfection in 12 minutes at room temperature (20 degrees C). To determine whether the endoscopy unit at Massachusetts General Hospital could cost-effectively increase endoscope throughput and decrease delayed procedures while maintaining biocidal efficacy with heavy use, ortho-phthalaldehyde solution (0.55% w/v) was used for high-level disinfection in place of glutaraldehyde in the unit's five automatic endoscope reprocessors. During this 38-day study, 1,839 endoscopes were processed in 1,201 cycles. Each machine ran an average of 80 disinfection cycles in each of three consecutive periods. The shorter disinfection time of ortho-phthalaldehyde (12 minutes) resulted in an average savings of 53 hours in disinfection time per study period for the five processors when compared with glutaraldehyde's 20-minute disinfection time.Ortho-phthalaldehyde costs more per gallon than glutaraldehyde ($31.03 versus $13.20). This higher cost would be offset, however, by additional time savings resulting from the fact that compared with glutaraldehyde, ortho-phthalaldehyde is faster-acting and a mixing and activation step is not required. In addition, testing prior to each cycle verified that despite heavy use, ortho-phthalaldehyde solution remained efficacious, lasting through an average of 80 cycles, whereas glutaraldehyde only lasts for an average of 40 cycles. Test strips showed the concentration of ortho-phthalaldehyde in the reprocessors remained above the minimum effective concentration for the entire 14-day maximal reuse period. Additional microbiological efficacy testing of spent solution diluted to its minimum effective concentration demonstrated the solution remained tuberculocidal in tests with Mycobacterium bovis.

摘要

邻苯二甲醛在室温(20摄氏度)下12分钟即可实现高水平消毒。为了确定马萨诸塞州总医院的内镜科室能否在大量使用内镜的情况下,在保持杀菌效果的同时,经济高效地提高内镜处理量并减少延迟手术,该科室在五台自动内镜清洗消毒机中使用邻苯二甲醛溶液(0.55% w/v)替代戊二醛进行高水平消毒。在这项为期38天的研究中,共进行了1201个周期的操作,处理了1839条内镜。每台机器在三个连续周期中平均运行80次消毒循环。与戊二醛20分钟的消毒时间相比,邻苯二甲醛较短的消毒时间(12分钟)使五台清洗消毒机在每个研究周期的消毒时间平均节省了总计53小时。每加仑邻苯二甲醛的成本比戊二醛高(31.03美元对13.20美元)。然而,与戊二醛相比,邻苯二甲醛起效更快且无需混合和活化步骤,由此节省的额外时间将抵消这一较高成本。此外,每个周期前的测试证实,尽管使用频繁,但邻苯二甲醛溶液仍然有效,平均可维持80个周期,而戊二醛平均仅能维持40个周期。测试条显示,在整个14天的最大再利用期内,清洗消毒机中邻苯二甲醛的浓度始终高于最低有效浓度。对稀释至最低有效浓度的用过的溶液进行的额外微生物效力测试表明,在针对牛分枝杆菌的测试中,该溶液仍具有杀结核菌的能力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验