Hüppe A, Raspe H
Institut für Sozialmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck.
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2003 Jun;42(3):143-54. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-40099.
Chronic back pain has a high personal impact, is frequent and of outstanding economical relevance. Analysis of the international literature indicates strong or moderate evidence for the effectiveness of multimodal multidisciplinary team care of chronic back pain. Our review aims at a complete review and critical appraisal of German studies of inpatient medical rehabilitation.
We conducted a systematic search for relevant German studies (1/1980 - 6/2001) using electronic data bases, manual search of congress abstracts and postal questionnaires of 712 German rehabilitation clinics. Relevant studies were categorized according to the recommendation of the Cochrane Back Review Group. For all studies, aims, participants, type of intervention, evaluation time, main outcomes and results were extracted and tabulated. The effect size for 6 central outcome parameters (pain intensity, functional status, catastrophizing, depression, vitality, days on sickness leave) were calculated using pre-post comparisons and were integrated into short and long term weighted means of intra-group effect sizes.
30 studies, both controlled and uncontrolled, report a multitude of positive changes with inpatient rehabilitation treatment. Improvements included both somatic and psychological parameters. However, methodological quality was often poor; only three studies fulfilled the criteria for high quality. Comparison of meta analyses of German and international studies indicates partly good agreement (e. g. changes in pain intensity), partly discrepancies (e. g. functional ability in daily activities). Taken together, inpatient rehabilitation treatment for chronic low back pain in Germany appears to be of low to moderate efficacy.
In the era of evidence based medicine, inpatient rehabilitation has to show its usefulness, necessity and efficiency as any other type of health care. For the German system of inpatient rehabilitation of chronic back pain available evidence is not conclusive, due to a lack of randomised controlled studies. The prevailing design of observational cohort studies has severe limitations in proving a causal relationship between outcomes and intervention. The international literature however provides more valid evidence in favour of the multimodal multidisciplinary intervention in chronic back pain. Under the assumption of a "class effect" of medical rehabilitation the German data seem to corroborate the conclusions drawn from international studies.
慢性背痛对个人影响重大,发病率高,具有显著的经济相关性。对国际文献的分析表明,多模式多学科团队护理慢性背痛的有效性有强有力或适度的证据。我们的综述旨在全面回顾和批判性评价德国住院医疗康复研究。
我们通过电子数据库、手动检索会议摘要以及向712家德国康复诊所邮寄问卷调查,对相关德国研究(1980年1月 - 2001年6月)进行系统检索。相关研究根据Cochrane背部综述小组的建议进行分类。对于所有研究,提取并列表列出其目的、参与者、干预类型、评估时间、主要结局和结果。使用前后比较计算6个核心结局参数(疼痛强度、功能状态、灾难化思维、抑郁、活力、病假天数)的效应大小,并将其纳入组内效应大小的短期和长期加权均值。
30项研究,包括对照研究和非对照研究,报告了住院康复治疗带来的众多积极变化。改善包括躯体和心理参数。然而,方法学质量往往较差;只有三项研究符合高质量标准。德国和国际研究的荟萃分析比较表明,部分结果有较好的一致性(如疼痛强度的变化),部分存在差异(如日常活动中的功能能力)。总体而言,德国慢性下背痛的住院康复治疗似乎疗效低至中等。
在循证医学时代,住院康复必须像其他任何类型的医疗保健一样,证明其有用性、必要性和效率。对于德国慢性背痛住院康复系统,由于缺乏随机对照研究,现有证据尚无定论。观察性队列研究的主流设计在证明结局与干预之间的因果关系方面有严重局限性。然而,国际文献提供了更有效的证据支持慢性背痛的多模式多学科干预。在假设医疗康复具有“类效应”的情况下,德国的数据似乎证实了从国际研究得出的结论。