McDermott Nicole Brown, VanSickle Tamitha, Motas Dominika, Friesen Robert H
Department of Anesthesiology, The Children's Hospital and the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver 80218, USA.
Anesth Analg. 2003 Jul;97(1):39-43, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000067402.02136.a2.
In this study, we tested the validity of the bispectral index (BIS) monitor during conscious and deep sedation of children by comparing it with the University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS), a validated observational pediatric sedation scale. Eighty-six children <12 yr of age were enrolled in this observational study. The subjects underwent conscious or deep sedation administered by non-anesthesiologists for diagnostic or therapeutic procedures in four departments in a children's hospital. Sedation medications varied among departments and were not controlled by the study protocol. An independent observer derived a UMSS score at 10-min intervals for 1 h during sedation; personnel administering sedation medications and performing the procedures were blinded to the BIS and UMSS scores. Significant correlation between BIS scores and UMSS scores was found (r = -0.704, P < 0.0001), including in subjects <6 mo of age (n = 6) (r = -0.761, P < 0.001). Poor correlation was found when ketamine or an oral combination of chloral hydrate, hydroxyzine, and meperidine were used for sedation. We conclude that BIS correlates well with UMSS scores and may be a valid measure of conscious and deep sedation in children.
We compared bispectral index scores with a validated observational scale of conscious and deep sedation in children and found significant correlation. We conclude that the bispectral index may be a valid measurement of depth of sedation in children.
在本研究中,我们通过将脑电双频指数(BIS)监测仪与已验证的儿科镇静观察量表——密歇根大学镇静量表(UMSS)进行比较,测试了其在儿童清醒和深度镇静期间的有效性。86名12岁以下儿童参与了这项观察性研究。受试者在一家儿童医院的四个科室接受由非麻醉医生实施的清醒或深度镇静,以进行诊断或治疗程序。各科室使用的镇静药物不同,且不受研究方案控制。一名独立观察者在镇静期间每隔10分钟得出一次UMSS评分,持续1小时;给予镇静药物和实施操作的人员对BIS和UMSS评分不知情。发现BIS评分与UMSS评分之间存在显著相关性(r = -0.704,P < 0.0001),包括6个月以下的受试者(n = 6)(r = -0.761,P < 0.001)。当使用氯胺酮或水合氯醛、羟嗪和哌替啶的口服组合进行镇静时,相关性较差。我们得出结论,BIS与UMSS评分相关性良好,可能是儿童清醒和深度镇静的有效测量指标。
我们将脑电双频指数评分与已验证的儿童清醒和深度镇静观察量表进行了比较,发现存在显著相关性。我们得出结论,脑电双频指数可能是儿童镇静深度的有效测量指标。