Suppr超能文献

脑电双频指数监测可量化儿童急诊科程序性镇静镇痛期间的镇静深度。

Bispectral index monitoring quantifies depth of sedation during emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia in children.

作者信息

Agrawal Dewesh, Feldman Henry A, Krauss Baruch, Waltzman Mark L

机构信息

Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital Boston, USA.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 2004 Feb;43(2):247-55. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(03)00721-2.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The bispectral index monitor uses processed electroencephalogram signals to measure sedation depth on a unitless scale from 0 to 100 (0, coma; 40 to 60, general anesthesia; 60 to 90, sedated; 100, awake). It has been validated in the operating room as an objective measure of sedation depth with nondissociative general anesthesia; however, its usefulness in the pediatric emergency department (ED) for procedural sedation and analgesia has not been established. We determine the ability of the bispectral index to monitor depth of nondissociative procedural sedation and analgesia in children.

METHODS

This was an observational study conducted in a children's hospital ED. Procedural sedation and analgesia was performed in the standard manner, with the addition of bispectral index monitoring and simultaneous clinical sedation scoring (modified Ramsay Sedation Scale [range 1 to 8; 1=alert, 8=unresponsive]). Paired bispectral index and Ramsay Sedation Scale scores were assigned every 5 minutes during the sedation. Ramsay Sedation Scale scores were assigned by a single study investigator blinded to the bispectral index score. An emergency physician independently administered all medications for procedural sedation and analgesia. The correlation between the paired bispectral index/Ramsay Sedation Scale scores was determined by using a repeated-measures regression analysis. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to determine the ability of the bispectral index to discriminate various thresholds of sedation depth.

RESULTS

A convenience sample of 20 patients was enrolled, providing 217 paired bispectral index/Ramsay Sedation Scale measurements. Median age was 4.6 years (range 0.4 to 16.7 years). Fourteen patients received midazolam with fentanyl; the remainder received pentobarbital. Bispectral index scores ranged from 40 to 98 (mean 81.6+/-16.1). Ramsay Sedation Scale scores ranged from 1 to 8 (median 3; interquartile range 2 to 4). The simple Pearson correlation between paired bispectral index and Ramsay Sedation Scale scores was -0.78 (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.83 to -0.72; P<.001). After adjustment for the nonindependence of intrapatient data with bivariate repeated-measures analysis, the correlation was -0.67 (95% CI -0.90 to -0.43; P<.001). The linear regression coefficient between bispectral index and Ramsay Sedation Scale scores was estimated to be between -5.7 and -12.7. ROC curve analysis demonstrated moderate to high discriminatory power of bispectral index scores in predicting level of sedation throughout the sedation continuum, with areas under the curve at least 0.87 for all Ramsay Sedation Scale score thresholds. Bispectral index scores between 60 and 90 predicted with moderate accuracy traditional clinical levels of sedation typically encountered during procedural sedation and analgesia in the pediatric ED.

CONCLUSION

Bispectral index monitoring correlated with clinical sedation scores and may serve as a useful, objective adjunct in quantifying depth of nondissociative procedural sedation and analgesia in children.

摘要

研究目的

脑电双频指数监测仪利用经过处理的脑电图信号,在0至100的无量纲范围内测量镇静深度(0表示昏迷;40至60表示全身麻醉;60至90表示镇静;100表示清醒)。它已在手术室中被验证为一种用于非解离性全身麻醉时镇静深度的客观测量方法;然而,其在儿科急诊科用于程序性镇静和镇痛的效用尚未得到证实。我们确定脑电双频指数监测儿童非解离性程序性镇静和镇痛深度的能力。

方法

这是一项在儿童医院急诊科进行的观察性研究。程序性镇静和镇痛以标准方式进行,同时增加脑电双频指数监测和同步临床镇静评分(改良拉姆齐镇静量表[范围为1至8;1 = 清醒,8 = 无反应])。在镇静过程中,每5分钟记录一次配对的脑电双频指数和拉姆齐镇静量表评分。拉姆齐镇静量表评分由一名对脑电双频指数评分不知情的研究调查员进行评定。一名急诊医生独立给予所有用于程序性镇静和镇痛的药物。使用重复测量回归分析确定配对的脑电双频指数/拉姆齐镇静量表评分之间的相关性。构建受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线以确定脑电双频指数区分不同镇静深度阈值的能力。

结果

纳入了20例患者的便利样本,提供了217对脑电双频指数/拉姆齐镇静量表测量值。中位年龄为4.6岁(范围0.4至16.7岁)。14例患者接受咪达唑仑联合芬太尼;其余患者接受戊巴比妥。脑电双频指数评分范围为40至98(平均81.6±16.1)。拉姆齐镇静量表评分范围为1至8(中位数为3;四分位间距为2至4)。配对的脑电双频指数和拉姆齐镇静量表评分之间的简单Pearson相关性为 -0.78(95%置信区间[CI] -0.83至 -0.72;P <.001)。在通过双变量重复测量分析对患者内数据的非独立性进行校正后,相关性为 -0.67(95% CI -0.90至 -0.43;P <.001)。脑电双频指数和拉姆齐镇静量表评分之间的线性回归系数估计在 -5.7至 -12.7之间。ROC曲线分析表明,脑电双频指数评分在预测整个镇静过程中的镇静水平方面具有中度至高辨别力,对于所有拉姆齐镇静量表评分阈值,曲线下面积至少为0.87。脑电双频指数评分在60至90之间对儿科急诊科程序性镇静和镇痛期间通常遇到的传统临床镇静水平具有中度准确的预测能力。

结论

脑电双频指数监测与临床镇静评分相关,可作为量化儿童非解离性程序性镇静和镇痛深度的一种有用的客观辅助手段。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验