Chase Mark W, Knapp Sandra, Cox Antony V, Clarkson James J, Butsko Yelena, Joseph Jeffrey, Savolainen Vincent, Parokonny Alex S
Molecular Systematics Section, Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3DS, UK.
Ann Bot. 2003 Jul;92(1):107-27. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcg087.
Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Nicotiana were investigated using parsimony analyses of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions of nuclear ribosomal DNA (nrDNA). In addition, origins of some amphidiploid taxa in Nicotiana were investigated using the techniques of genomic in situ hybridization (GISH), and the results of both sets of analyses were used to evaluate previous hypotheses about the origins of these taxa. Phylogenetic analyses of the ITS nrDNA data were performed on the entire genus (66 of 77 naturally occurring species, plus three artificial hybrids), comprising both diploid and polyploid taxa, and on the diploid taxa only (35 species) to examine the effects of amphidiploids on estimates of relationships. All taxa, regardless of ploidy, produced clean, single copies of the ITS region, even though some taxa are hybrids. Results are compared with a published plastid (matK) phylogeny using fewer, but many of the same, taxa. The patterns of relationships in Nicotiana, as seen in both analyses, are largely congruent with each other and previous evolutionary ideas based on morphology and cytology, but some important differences are apparent. None of the currently recognized subgenera of Nicotiana is monophyletic and, although most of the currently recognized sections are coherent, others are clearly polyphyletic. Relying solely upon ITS nrDNA analysis to reveal phylogenetic patterns in a complex genus such as Nicotiana is insufficient, and it is clear that conventional analysis of single data sets, such as ITS, is likely to be misleading in at least some respects about evolutionary history. ITS sequences of natural and well-documented amphidiploids are similar or identical to one of their two parents-usually, but not always, the maternal parent-and are not in any sense themselves 'hybrid'. Knowing how ITS evolves in artificial amphidiploids gives insight into what ITS analysis might reveal about naturally occurring amphidiploids of unknown origin, and it is in this perspective that analysis of ITS sequences is highly informative.
利用核核糖体DNA(nrDNA)的内部转录间隔区(ITS)进行简约分析,研究了烟草属的系统发育关系。此外,运用基因组原位杂交(GISH)技术研究了烟草属中一些双二倍体类群的起源,并将两组分析结果用于评估先前关于这些类群起源的假说。对整个烟草属(77个自然物种中的66个,加上3个人工杂交种)进行了ITS nrDNA数据的系统发育分析,其中包括二倍体和多倍体类群,并且仅对二倍体类群(35个物种)进行了分析,以检验双二倍体对亲缘关系估计的影响。所有类群,无论其倍性如何,即使有些类群是杂种,都产生了清晰的ITS区域单拷贝。使用较少但许多相同的类群,将结果与已发表的质体(matK)系统发育进行了比较。从这两种分析中可以看出,烟草属中的亲缘关系模式在很大程度上相互一致,并且与先前基于形态学和细胞学的进化观点相符,但也存在一些明显的重要差异。烟草属目前公认的亚属均非单系的,虽然目前公认的大多数组是连贯的,但其他组显然是多系的。仅依靠ITS nrDNA分析来揭示像烟草属这样的复杂属中的系统发育模式是不够的,很明显,对单个数据集(如ITS)进行传统分析在至少某些方面可能会对进化历史产生误导。自然的且有充分文献记载的双二倍体的ITS序列与其两个亲本之一相似或相同——通常但并非总是母本亲本——并且在任何意义上它们本身都不是“杂种”。了解ITS在人工双二倍体中的进化方式,有助于深入了解ITS分析可能揭示的未知起源的自然双二倍体的情况,正是从这个角度来看,ITS序列分析具有很高的信息量。