Lynn Steven Jay, Green Joseph P, Jaquith Leah, Gasior Donna
Psychology Department, State University of New York at Binghamton, New York 13902, USA.
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2003 Jan;51(1):51-65. doi: 10.1076/iceh.51.1.51.14062.
Participants received 1 of 3 instructional sets designed to manipulate their performance standards (i.e., criteria used to evaluate hypnotic performance): (a) stringent set (n = 33), these subjects were told that responsive subjects respond immediately to hypnosis and imagine realistically, (b) lenient set (n = 30), these subjects were told that responsive subjects do not necessarily respond immediately or imagine realistically, and (c) control set (n = 34), standard prehypnotic information. As expected, compared to controls, stringent set participants were less responsive to hypnosis, as indexed by measures of actual and estimated suggestibility, subjective involvement, involuntariness, quickness of responding, satisfaction, and imaginative ability. Stringent set participants estimated they passed fewer suggestions, were less satisfied with their performance, and reported less subjective involvement than individuals in the lenient condition.
参与者接受了旨在操纵其表现标准（即用于评估催眠表现的标准）的三组指导语中的一组：(a) 严格组（n = 33），这些受试者被告知反应灵敏的受试者会立即对催眠做出反应并进行逼真的想象；(b) 宽松组（n = 30），这些受试者被告知反应灵敏的受试者不一定会立即做出反应或进行逼真的想象；(c) 对照组（n = 34），给予标准的催眠前信息。正如预期的那样，与对照组相比，严格组的参与者对催眠的反应较弱，这通过实际和估计的易受暗示性、主观投入、不由自主性、反应速度、满意度和想象力等指标来衡量。严格组参与者估计他们通过的暗示较少，对自己的表现不太满意，并且与宽松组的个体相比，报告的主观投入较少。
