Bartis S P, Zamansky H S
Department of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115.
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 1990 Jul;38(3):168-82. doi: 10.1080/00207149008414516.
2 experiments were carried out to assess the relative contributions of dissociation and absorption as cognitive strategies employed by high and low hypnotizable Ss in responding successfully to hypnotic suggestions. Of special interest was the manner in which Ss deal with conflicting information typically inherent in hypnotic suggestions. In the first experiment, Ss rated their attentional focus and the involuntariness of their experience after responding to a number of hypnotic suggestions administered in the usual manner. In the second experiment, the level of conflict was varied by instructing some Ss to imagine a circumstance that was congruent and other Ss to imagine a circumstance that was incongruent with the suggested behavioral response. The results of the 2 experiments were consistent in suggesting that, depending upon the nature of the hypnotic suggestion, high hypnotizable Ss are able to employ dissociation or absorption in order to respond successfully. Low hypnotizable Ss, on the other hand, seem to be relatively ineffective dissociators. When the structure of the hypnotic suggestion precludes the use of absorption, the performance of low hypnotizables deteriorates.
进行了两项实验,以评估解离和专注作为高催眠易感性和低催眠易感性被试在成功回应催眠暗示时所采用的认知策略的相对作用。特别令人感兴趣的是被试处理催眠暗示中通常固有的冲突信息的方式。在第一个实验中,被试在以常规方式接受一系列催眠暗示后,对他们的注意力焦点和体验的不由自主程度进行评分。在第二个实验中,通过指示一些被试想象与建议的行为反应一致的情境,而其他被试想象与建议的行为反应不一致的情境,来改变冲突水平。这两项实验的结果一致表明,根据催眠暗示的性质,高催眠易感性被试能够采用解离或专注来成功回应。另一方面,低催眠易感性被试似乎是相对无效的解离者。当催眠暗示的结构排除了专注的使用时,低催眠易感性被试的表现会变差。