Suppr超能文献

奥氮平与利培酮治疗精神分裂症的比较:德克萨斯州医疗补助受助者的成本对比

Olanzapine versus risperidone in the treatment of schizophrenia : a comparison of costs among Texas Medicaid recipients.

作者信息

Rascati Karen L, Johnsrud Michael T, Crismon M Lynn, Lage Maureen J, Barber Beth L

机构信息

College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 2003;21(10):683-97. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200321100-00001.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine both schizophrenia-related costs and total (schizophrenia plus non-schizophrenia) healthcare costs among Texas Medicaid recipients who had been diagnosed with a schizophrenic disorder and had been initiated on olanzapine or risperidone.

METHODS

Cost data for services and prescription use were retrieved for 2,885 patients with schizophrenia who were initiated on olanzapine or risperidone between 1 January 1997 and 31 August 1998. Each patient was followed for 1 year before and 1 year after initiation of therapy. Multivariate analysis was used to control for a wide range of factors (drug choice, patient demographics, pre-utilisation costs, region, health conditions, and treatment patterns) that may influence schizophrenia-related costs and total healthcare costs. Estimation was conducted via a two-stage instrumental variables model.

RESULTS

The mean unadjusted total schizophrenia-related cost per patient per year during the observation period was 4,892 US dollars, and the total unadjusted healthcare cost per patient was 7,101 US dollars. Results revealed significant regional variation in schizophrenia-related and total healthcare costs. Significantly higher total healthcare costs were found for patients with other (nonpsychiatric) diagnoses, such as HIV and diabetes mellitus. Although, on average, patients taking olanzapine stayed on therapy longer than those taking risperidone (248.2 days vs 211.1 days; p < 0.0001), multivariate analysis revealed no significant difference in schizophrenia-related costs between patients who received olanzapine and risperidone (123 US dollars lower with olanzapine; p = 0.6439). However, patients who received olanzapine compared with risperidone had significantly lower total medical costs (693 US dollars lower with olanzapine; p = 0.0311).

CONCLUSION

This naturalistic study used data from a Texas Medicaid population to examine the schizophrenia-related costs and total healthcare costs for patients who received olanzapine versus risperidone. Multivariate analysis revealed no significant differences in schizophrenia-related costs for patients receiving olanzapine compared with risperidone, although total medical costs were significantly lower for patients initiated on olanzapine.

摘要

目的

研究德克萨斯州医疗补助计划受助者中,已被诊断患有精神分裂症且已开始使用奥氮平或利培酮治疗的患者的精神分裂症相关费用以及总(精神分裂症加非精神分裂症)医疗费用。

方法

检索了1997年1月1日至1998年8月31日期间开始使用奥氮平或利培酮治疗的2885例精神分裂症患者的服务和处方使用成本数据。每位患者在治疗开始前随访1年,治疗开始后随访1年。采用多变量分析来控制可能影响精神分裂症相关费用和总医疗费用的一系列因素(药物选择、患者人口统计学特征、治疗前费用、地区、健康状况和治疗模式)。估计通过两阶段工具变量模型进行。

结果

观察期内每位患者每年未经调整的精神分裂症相关平均总费用为4892美元,每位患者未经调整的总医疗费用为7101美元。结果显示精神分裂症相关费用和总医疗费用存在显著的地区差异。发现患有其他(非精神科)诊断(如艾滋病毒和糖尿病)的患者总医疗费用显著更高。尽管平均而言,服用奥氮平的患者治疗持续时间比服用利培酮的患者更长(248.2天对211.1天;p<0.0001),但多变量分析显示接受奥氮平和利培酮治疗的患者在精神分裂症相关费用上无显著差异(奥氮平治疗费用低123美元;p=0.6439)。然而,与接受利培酮治疗的患者相比,接受奥氮平治疗的患者总医疗费用显著更低(奥氮平治疗费用低693美元;p=0.0311)。

结论

这项观察性研究使用了来自德克萨斯州医疗补助计划人群的数据,来研究接受奥氮平与利培酮治疗的患者的精神分裂症相关费用和总医疗费用。多变量分析显示,与接受利培酮治疗的患者相比,接受奥氮平治疗的患者在精神分裂症相关费用上无显著差异,尽管开始使用奥氮平治疗的患者总医疗费用显著更低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验