Revicki D A
Center for Health Outcomes Research, MEDTAP International Inc, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.
Curr Opin Investig Drugs. 2001 Jan;2(1):110-7.
A comprehensive evaluation of atypical antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia involves documentation of clinical effectiveness, quality of life and medical cost outcomes. The results of pharmacoeconomic studies assist psychiatrists, and other healthcare decision-makers, in identifying pharmacotherapies that provide the greatest benefit to patients at the most acceptable cost. The cost-effectiveness of the newer atypical antipsychotics has been examined using clinical decision-modeling studies and randomized clinical trials. The research evidence suggests that clozapine is a cost-effective treatment for neuroleptic refractory schizophrenia. Olanzapine and risperidone may be cost-neutral or, at best, slightly cost-saving compared with conventional antipsychotics, although they do improve clinical symptoms and quality of life outcomes. There is insufficient published data on pharmacoeconomic outcomes for sertindole, quetiapine and ziprasidone to make any conclusions about their cost-effectiveness in treating schizophrenia.
对非典型抗精神病药物治疗精神分裂症进行全面评估,涉及记录临床疗效、生活质量和医疗成本结果。药物经济学研究结果有助于精神科医生及其他医疗保健决策者确定能以最可接受成本为患者带来最大益处的药物疗法。已通过临床决策模型研究和随机临床试验对新型非典型抗精神病药物的成本效益进行了检验。研究证据表明,氯氮平是治疗难治性精神分裂症的一种具有成本效益的疗法。与传统抗精神病药物相比,奥氮平和利培酮可能成本相当,或者充其量只是略有节省成本,尽管它们确实能改善临床症状和生活质量结果。关于舍吲哚、喹硫平和齐拉西酮的药物经济学结果,公开数据不足,无法就它们治疗精神分裂症的成本效益得出任何结论。