Wight J, Paisley S, Knight C
ScHARR, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
Haemophilia. 2003 Jul;9(4):436-63. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2516.2003.00781.x.
In some patients with haemophilia A, therapeutically administered factor VIII (FVIII) comes to stimulate the production of antibodies (inhibitors) which react with FVIII to render it ineffective. As a result, FVIII cannot be used prophylactically and patients become liable to recurrent bleeds. There are two elements to the management of patients with inhibitors: the treatment of bleeding episodes, and attempts to abolish inhibitor production through the induction of immune tolerance. This paper reports a systematic review of the best available evidence of clinical effectiveness in relation to immune tolerance induction (ITI) in patients with haemophilia A with inhibitors. Owing to the lack of randomized controlled trials on this topic, broad inclusion criteria with regard to study design were applied in order to assess the best available evidence for each intervention. As a result of the clinical and methodological heterogeneity of the evidence, it was not appropriate to pool data across studies; instead, data were synthesized using tabulation and qualitative narrative assessment. The International Registry provides the most reliable estimate of the proportion of successful cases of ITI [48.7%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 42.6-52.7%]. The duration of effect is unclear, but relapses appear to be infrequent. The International Registry shows a rate of relapse of 15% at 15 years. The comparative effectiveness of different protocols is uncertain, as no trials have been undertaken which compare them directly. However, the evidence suggests that the Bonn protocol may be more effective than the Malmö or low-dose protocols. There is no good evidence that immunosuppressive drug regimens are effective.
在一些甲型血友病患者中,治疗性给予的凝血因子VIII(FVIII)会刺激抗体(抑制剂)的产生,这些抗体与FVIII发生反应,使其失效。结果,FVIII不能用于预防性治疗,患者容易反复出血。对于有抑制剂的患者的管理有两个要素:出血发作的治疗,以及通过诱导免疫耐受来消除抑制剂产生的尝试。本文报告了对甲型血友病有抑制剂患者免疫耐受诱导(ITI)临床有效性的现有最佳证据的系统评价。由于缺乏关于该主题的随机对照试验,因此应用了关于研究设计的广泛纳入标准,以评估每种干预措施的现有最佳证据。由于证据在临床和方法上的异质性,不适合对各研究的数据进行合并;相反,数据是通过列表和定性叙述性评估进行综合的。国际登记处提供了ITI成功病例比例的最可靠估计[48.7%,95%置信区间(CI)42.6 - 52.7%]。效果持续时间尚不清楚,但复发似乎很少见。国际登记处显示15年时的复发率为15%。不同方案的相对有效性尚不确定,因为尚未进行直接比较它们的试验。然而有证据表明,波恩方案可能比马尔默方案或低剂量方案更有效。没有充分证据表明免疫抑制药物方案有效。