Hanajima Ritsuko, Furubayashi Toshiaki, Iwata Nobue Kobayashi, Shiio Yasushi, Okabe Shingo, Kanazawa Ichiro, Ugawa Yoshikazu
Department of Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.
Exp Brain Res. 2003 Aug;151(4):427-34. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1455-z. Epub 2003 Jun 27.
Paired-pulse magnetic stimulation has been widely used to study intracortical inhibition of the motor cortex. Inhibition at interstimulus intervals (ISIs) of 1-5 ms is ascribed to a GABAergic inhibitory system in the motor cortex. However, Fisher et al. have proposed that different mechanisms are operating at an ISI of 1 ms and 2.5 ms. In order to confirm their concept and clarify whether inhibition at all these intervals is produced by a single mechanism, we compared effects of paired-pulse stimulation at ISIs of 1 ms, 2 ms, and 3-5 ms. We evaluated how intracortical inhibition affected the I3-wave, I1-wave, magnetic D-wave, and anodal D-wave components of electromyographic (EMG) responses using previously reported methods. The data suggest that three separate effects occur within these ISIs. At ISIs of 3-5 ms, inhibition was evoked only in responses to I3-waves, whereas no inhibition was elicited in responses to I1-waves or magnetic D-waves. In contrast, at an ISI of 1 ms, responses to I3-waves and I1-waves were moderately suppressed. Moreover, even magnetic D-waves were slightly suppressed, whereas anodal D-waves were unaffected. At an ISI of 2 ms, none of the descending volleys were inhibited. We propose that we should use ISIs of 3-5 ms for estimating function of the GABAergic inhibitory system of the motor cortex by paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Our results support the idea of Fisher et al. that the mechanism responsible for the inhibition at an ISI of 1 ms is not the same as that responsible for suppression at ISIs of 3-5 ms (GABAergic inhibitory circuits in the motor cortex). At an ISI of 2 ms, we suggest that the inhibitory influence evoked by the first stimulus (S1) should collide with or be occluded by the second stimulus (S2), which leads to the lack of inhibition when the subjects make a voluntary contraction of the target muscle.
配对脉冲磁刺激已被广泛用于研究运动皮层的皮质内抑制。刺激间隔(ISI)为1 - 5毫秒时的抑制作用归因于运动皮层中的γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)能抑制系统。然而,费舍尔等人提出,在ISI为1毫秒和2.5毫秒时存在不同的机制。为了证实他们的观点并阐明在所有这些间隔的抑制是否由单一机制产生,我们比较了ISI为1毫秒、2毫秒和3 - 5毫秒时配对脉冲刺激的效果。我们使用先前报道的方法评估了皮质内抑制如何影响肌电图(EMG)反应的I3波、I1波、磁D波和阳极D波成分。数据表明在这些ISI内出现了三种不同的效应。在ISI为3 - 5毫秒时,仅在对I3波的反应中诱发抑制,而对I1波或磁D波的反应中未诱发抑制。相反,在ISI为1毫秒时,对I3波和I1波的反应受到适度抑制。此外,甚至磁D波也略有抑制,而阳极D波未受影响。在ISI为2毫秒时,下行冲动均未受到抑制。我们建议,通过配对脉冲经颅磁刺激(TMS)评估运动皮层GABA能抑制系统功能时应使用ISI为3 - 5毫秒。我们的结果支持费舍尔等人的观点,即ISI为1毫秒时负责抑制的机制与ISI为3 - 5毫秒时负责抑制的机制(运动皮层中的GABA能抑制回路)不同。在ISI为2毫秒时,我们认为第一个刺激(S1)诱发的抑制性影响应与第二个刺激(S2)碰撞或被其阻断,这导致受试者在目标肌肉进行自主收缩时缺乏抑制。