• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The verapamil versus amlodipine in nondiabetic nephropathies treated with trandolapril (VVANNTT) study.

作者信息

Boero Roberto, Rollino Cristiana, Massara Carlo, Berto Ilario M, Perosa Paolo, Vagelli Giuseppe, Lanfranco Giacomo, Quarello Francesco

机构信息

Nefrologia e Dialisi, Ospedale G. Bosco, Torino, Italy.

出版信息

Am J Kidney Dis. 2003 Jul;42(1):67-75. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(03)00410-4.

DOI:10.1016/s0272-6386(03)00410-4
PMID:12830458
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We tested whether the combination of verapamil (V) or amlodipine (A) with trandolapril (T) affected proteinuria differently from T alone in patients with nondiabetic nephropathies.

METHODS

After T, 2 mg, in open conditions for 1 month, 69 patients were randomly assigned to be administered T, 2 mg, combined with V, 180 mg, plus a placebo or T, 2 mg, plus A, 5 mg, once a day in a double-blind fashion. Patients were followed up for 8 months.

RESULTS

Proteinuria diminished significantly after T treatment from mean protein excretion of 3,078 +/- 244 (SEM) to 2,537 +/- 204 mg/24 h (P = 0.018). In the randomized phase, there was a slight reduction in proteinuria in both groups without significant differences within and between treatments (T + V, protein from 2,335 +/- 233 to 2,124 +/- 247 mg/24 h; T + A, protein from 2,715 +/- 325 to 2,671 +/- 469 mg/24 h). The selectivity index (SI; calculated as the ratio of immunoglobulin G to albumin clearance) was slightly and not significantly reduced in patients treated with T plus V from a median of 0.20 (interquartile range, 0.13) to 0.16 (interquartile range, 0.15; P = not significant), whereas it significantly increased from 0.20 (interquartile range, 0.14) to 0.30 (interquartile range, 0.14; P = 0.0001) in patients treated with T plus A. Modifications in SI and serum creatinine levels at the end of the study from randomization were significantly directly correlated (r = 0.45; P = 0.001). The number of patients reporting adverse effects was significantly higher in the T plus A than T plus V group (63.8% versus 33.3%; P = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

In patients with nondiabetic proteinuric nephropathies treated with T, the combination of V or A does not significantly increase its antiproteinuric effect.

摘要

相似文献

1
The verapamil versus amlodipine in nondiabetic nephropathies treated with trandolapril (VVANNTT) study.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2003 Jul;42(1):67-75. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(03)00410-4.
2
Verapamil versus amlodipine in proteinuric non-diabetic nephropathies treated with trandolapril (VVANNTT study): design of a prospective randomized multicenter trial.用群多普利治疗的蛋白尿性非糖尿病肾病中维拉帕米与氨氯地平的比较(VVANNTT研究):一项前瞻性随机多中心试验的设计
J Nephrol. 2001 Jan-Feb;14(1):15-8.
3
Dissociation between blood pressure reduction and fall in proteinuria in primary renal disease: a randomized double-blind trial.原发性肾脏疾病中血压降低与蛋白尿减少之间的分离:一项随机双盲试验。
J Hypertens. 2002 Apr;20(4):729-37. doi: 10.1097/00004872-200204000-00032.
4
Efficacy of combination therapy with trandolapril and verapamil sr in primary hypertension: a 4 x 4 trial design. The Trandolapril Study Group.群多普利与维拉帕米缓释剂联合治疗原发性高血压的疗效:4×4试验设计。群多普利研究组。
Clin Exp Hypertens. 1997 Apr;19(3):373-87. doi: 10.3109/10641969709080825.
5
Effects of calcium channel blockers on proteinuria in patients with diabetic nephropathy.钙通道阻滞剂对糖尿病肾病患者蛋白尿的影响。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2008 Oct;10(10):761-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2008.00016.x.
6
Effects of an ACE inhibitor/calcium antagonist combination on proteinuria in diabetic nephropathy.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/钙拮抗剂联合用药对糖尿病肾病蛋白尿的影响。
Kidney Int. 1998 Oct;54(4):1283-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1998.00083.x.
7
Antiproteinuric efficacy of verapamil in comparison to trandolapril in non-diabetic renal disease.维拉帕米与群多普利治疗非糖尿病肾病的抗蛋白尿疗效比较
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1999 Jan;14(1):98-104. doi: 10.1093/ndt/14.1.98.
8
Effects of verapamil and trandolapril in the treatment of hypertension. Trandolapril Study Group.维拉帕米和群多普利治疗高血压的效果。群多普利研究组。
Am J Hypertens. 1998 Mar;11(3 Pt 1):322-7. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(97)00466-4.
9
[The effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on the progression of chronic renal failure].[血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂对慢性肾衰竭进展的影响]
Presse Med. 2002 Nov 9;31(36):1714-20.
10
The fixed combination of verapamil SR/trandolapril.维拉帕米缓释片/群多普利的固定复方制剂
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2000 Mar;1(3):515-35. doi: 10.1517/14656566.1.3.515.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative peripheral edema for dihydropyridines calcium channel blockers treatment: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.二氢吡啶类钙通道阻滞剂治疗的外周性水肿比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2022 May;24(5):536-554. doi: 10.1111/jch.14436. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
2
Dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers and renal disease.二氢吡啶类钙通道阻滞剂与肾脏疾病
Hypertens Res. 2017 Jan;40(1):21-28. doi: 10.1038/hr.2016.85. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
3
Analysis of a single hemodialysis on phosphate removal of the internal fistula patients by mathematical and statistical methods.
数学和统计学方法分析单次血液透析对内瘘患者磷去除的效果。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2013;2013:856897. doi: 10.1155/2013/856897. Epub 2013 Dec 24.
4
Current concepts in combination therapy for the treatment of hypertension: combined calcium channel blockers and RAAS inhibitors.高血压联合治疗的当前概念:钙通道阻滞剂与肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统(RAAS)抑制剂联合使用
Integr Blood Press Control. 2009;2:55-62. doi: 10.2147/ibpc.s6232. Epub 2009 Nov 23.
5
Effects of calcium channel blockers on proteinuria in patients with diabetic nephropathy.钙通道阻滞剂对糖尿病肾病患者蛋白尿的影响。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2008 Oct;10(10):761-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2008.00016.x.
6
Renal protection: are all antihypertensive drugs comparable?肾脏保护:所有抗高血压药物都具有可比性吗?
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2007 Nov;9(5):373-9. doi: 10.1007/s11906-007-0069-4.
7
Use of calcium antagonists in renal patients: therapeutic benefit or medical malpractice?
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2003 Oct;5(5):430-6. doi: 10.1007/s11906-003-0090-1.