Suppr超能文献

[恶性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的组织学分类与患者生存率: Kiel 分类法与工作分类法的比较]

[Histological classification of malignant non-Hodgkin's lymphomas and patient survival: the Kiel classification versus the working formulation].

作者信息

Nizze H, Bühring U

机构信息

Institut für Pathologie, Universität Rostock.

出版信息

Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol. 1992;76:110-6.

PMID:1283239
Abstract

In 163 out of 251 histologically classified malignant Non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, a comparison was made of the patient survival with respect to both histological type and malignant grade according to the Kiel Classification (KC) and the three prognostic groups of the Working Formulation (WF). As expected, the survival rate of 94 low-grade malignant lymphoma cases (KC) was significantly better than that of 69 high-grade cases (p < 0.0001). Similar results were found both for 46 low grade cases (WF) in comparison to 50 high grade cases (p < 0.001) and for 67 intermediate grade cases (WF) compared with the 50 high grade cases (p < 0.05). The survival rates of low and intermediate grade cases (WF), however, showed no statistically significant difference. The low- and high-grade malignant lymphoma entities of KC, which together constitute the intermediate grade of WF, differed significantly with respect to patient survival (p < 0.05). Therefore, it appears that an intermediate grade is not essential in the KC.

摘要

在251例经组织学分类的恶性非霍奇金淋巴瘤中,对163例患者的生存情况进行了比较,比较内容涉及根据基尔分类法(KC)划分的组织学类型和恶性程度,以及工作分类法(WF)的三个预后组。正如预期的那样,94例低级别恶性淋巴瘤病例(KC)的生存率显著高于69例高级别病例(p < 0.0001)。46例低级别病例(WF)与50例高级别病例相比(p < 0.001),以及67例中级别病例(WF)与50例高级别病例相比(p < 0.05),均发现了类似结果。然而,低级别和中级别病例(WF)的生存率没有显示出统计学上的显著差异。KC中共同构成WF中级别的低级别和高级别恶性淋巴瘤实体,在患者生存方面存在显著差异(p < 0.05)。因此,似乎KC中不需要中级别。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验