Tchekmedyian N Simon, Kallich Joel, McDermott Anne, Fayers Peter, Erder M Haim
Pacific Shores Medical Group, Long Beach, California 90813, USA.
Cancer. 2003 Jul 1;98(1):198-203. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11463.
The authors examined the relationship between changes in depression and anxiety levels with changes in fatigue levels among anemic patients with lung cancer who participated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of darbepoetin alfa for the treatment of anemia.
Patients completed the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) Depression and Anxiety subscales and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) Fatigue subscale during the trial. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to compare changes in the BSI scores with changes in the FACT Fatigue scores. Multiple regression models were used to explore sociodemographic and clinical explanatory variables.
At baseline, 25% and 35% of 250 patients reported high levels (normed BSI scores >or= 65) of anxiety and depression, respectively. Correlations of changes in normed BSI Anxiety and Depression subscale scores with changes in FACT Fatigue scores had coefficients of -0.45 (P < 0.001) and -0.44 (P < 0.001), respectively. In the multiple regression models, change in the FACT Fatigue score was the only significant explanatory variable (P < 0.001). For every unit improvement in FACT Fatigue score, there was a corresponding improvement of 0.7 points and 0.8 points in anxiety and depression levels, respectively.
Improvements in fatigue were associated significantly with reductions in anxiety and depression. For patients with anemia, fatigue can be improved or reversed with darbepoetin alfa therapy. Thus, less fatigued patients also may benefit from reduced levels of anxiety and depression.
作者在参与一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的临床研究(使用阿法达贝泊汀治疗贫血)的肺癌贫血患者中,研究了抑郁和焦虑水平的变化与疲劳水平变化之间的关系。
患者在试验期间完成了简明症状量表(BSI)抑郁和焦虑分量表以及癌症治疗功能评估(FACT)疲劳分量表。使用Pearson相关系数比较BSI得分的变化与FACT疲劳得分的变化。使用多元回归模型探索社会人口统计学和临床解释变量。
在基线时,250名患者中分别有25%和35%报告有高水平(标准化BSI得分≥65)的焦虑和抑郁。标准化BSI焦虑和抑郁分量表得分的变化与FACT疲劳得分变化的相关性系数分别为-0.45(P<0.001)和-0.44(P<0.001)。在多元回归模型中,FACT疲劳得分的变化是唯一显著的解释变量(P<0.001)。FACT疲劳得分每提高一个单位,焦虑和抑郁水平分别相应提高0.7分和0.8分。
疲劳的改善与焦虑和抑郁的减轻显著相关。对于贫血患者,阿法达贝泊汀治疗可改善或逆转疲劳。因此,疲劳减轻的患者也可能从焦虑和抑郁水平的降低中获益。