Suppr超能文献

青光眼的药物治疗成本考量

Medical therapy cost considerations for glaucoma.

作者信息

Fiscella Richard G, Green Amy, Patuszynski Daniel H, Wilensky Jacob

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Illinois at Chicago, Illinois 60612, USA.

出版信息

Am J Ophthalmol. 2003 Jul;136(1):18-25. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(03)00102-8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the calculated daily patient cost (cost minimization) of medical glaucoma therapy and review cost trends.

DESIGN

Experimental, controlled, prospective study.

METHODS

The actual volume of various glaucoma medications or glaucoma medications with redesigned bottles was determined for most commercially available sizes of the tested products. The drops per milliliter based on the actual volume and the daily costs of the dosage schedules recommended by the manufacturers were compared. The cost of each bottle of medication was determined from the average wholesale price (AWP) in the United States. A comparison to 1999 prices where applicable will be analyzed to review costing trends.

RESULTS

The generic timolol products (range, US dollars 0.38-US dollars 0.46 per day) were similar on a cost per day basis vs Betimol (Santen, Napa Valley, California, USA), Optipranolol (Bausch and Lomb Pharmaceuticals, Tampa, Florida, USA) and Timoptic (Merck, West Point, Pennsylvania, USA). Their percentage cost increase ranged from 5% to 22% since 1999, except for generic timolol XE gel-forming solution (48%). Betagan (Allergan, Irvine, California, USA), Betoptic S (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, Texas, USA), and Ocupress (Novartis, Duluth, Georgia, USA) ranged from US dollars 0.88 to US dollars 1.11 per day, and their percentage cost increase ranged from 33% to 53%. Some brand-only products have raised their AWPs a greater percentage, including Betoptic S (37%), Iopidine (Alcon, Fort Worth, Texas, USA) (50%), Ocupress (Novartis Ophthalmics, Duluth, Georgia, USA) (53%), and Pilopine gel (Alcon, Fort Worth, Texas, USA) (32%). The mean cost per day for the topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors Azopt (Alcon Laboratories; US dollars 1.33 per day) and Trusopt (Merck; US dollars 1.05 per day) differed from 1999 when prices were almost identical. Cosopt (Merck; timolol 0.5% plus dorzolamide 2%, US dollars 1.04 per day) was less than the cost of separate bottles of a topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitor and a beta-blocker. The selective alpha-2 agonist brimonidine 0.15% with Purite (Alphagan-P, Allergan, 5 ml) twice daily was US dollars 1.29 per day. The prostaglandin analogs were comparably priced with Lumigan (Allergan) US dollars 0.95 per day, Xalatan (Pharmacia and Upjohn, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA) US dollars 1.25 per day, Travatan (Alcon Laboratories) US dollars 1.01 per day, and Rescula (Novartis) US dollars 0.90 per day.

CONCLUSIONS

All generic timolol, Betimol, Optipranolol, Timoptic, and Timoptic XE (Merck) ranged from US dollars 0.38 to US dollars 0.50 per day. Other beta-blocker products were about twice as costly, ranging from US dollars 0.88 to US dollars 1.11 per day. Cosopt (US dollars 1.05 per day) was less costly than separate bottles of a topical beta-blocker and a topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitor dosed three times daily or twice daily. The prostaglandin analogs ranged from US dollars 0.90 per day (Rescula) to US dollars 1.25 per day (Xalatan). Newer glaucoma medications exhibit similar costs per day in many cases, compared with more traditional medications, especially with greater price increases in older brand-only products.

摘要

目的

确定青光眼药物治疗的每日计算患者成本(成本最小化)并回顾成本趋势。

设计

实验性、对照、前瞻性研究。

方法

针对大多数市售规格的受试产品,确定各种青光眼药物或重新设计包装瓶的青光眼药物的实际用量。比较基于实际用量的每毫升滴数以及制造商推荐的给药方案的每日成本。每瓶药物的成本根据美国的平均批发价(AWP)确定。将在适用情况下与1999年价格进行比较,以分析成本趋势。

结果

通用型噻吗洛尔产品(每日成本范围为0.38美元至0.46美元)在每日成本方面与贝他根(Santen,美国加利福尼亚州纳帕谷)、奥普特普洛尔(博士伦制药公司,美国佛罗里达州坦帕)和噻吗心安(默克公司,美国宾夕法尼亚州西点)相似。自1999年以来,它们的成本涨幅在5%至22%之间,通用型噻吗洛尔XE凝胶形成溶液除外(48%)。贝他根(爱尔康公司,美国加利福尼亚州欧文)、倍他洛尔S(爱尔康实验室,美国得克萨斯州沃思堡)和奥普舒(诺华公司,美国佐治亚州德卢斯)每日成本在0.88美元至1.11美元之间,成本涨幅在33%至53%之间。一些仅为品牌的产品提高其AWP的百分比更高,包括倍他洛尔S(37%)、碘必殊(爱尔康,美国得克萨斯州沃思堡)(50%)、奥普舒(诺华眼科,美国佐治亚州德卢斯)(53%)和匹鲁卡品凝胶(爱尔康,美国得克萨斯州沃思堡)(32%)。局部用碳酸酐酶抑制剂阿佐普特(爱尔康实验室;每日1.33美元)和曲伏前列素(默克;每日1.05美元)的每日平均成本与1999年不同,当时价格几乎相同。可素比(默克;0.5%噻吗洛尔加2%多佐胺,每日1.04美元)低于单独一瓶局部用碳酸酐酶抑制剂和每日给药三次或两次的β受体阻滞剂的成本。含Purite的0.15%选择性α-2激动剂溴莫尼定(阿法根-P,爱尔康,5毫升)每日两次给药时每日成本为1.29美元。前列腺素类似物价格相当,卢美根(爱尔康)每日0.95美元,适利达(法玛西亚和普强公司,美国密歇根州卡拉马祖)每日1.25美元, travatan(爱尔康实验室)每日1.01美元,瑞新(诺华)每日0.90美元。

结论

所有通用型噻吗洛尔、贝他根、奥普特普洛尔、噻吗心安和噻吗心安XE(默克)每日成本在0.38美元至0.50美元之间。其他β受体阻滞剂产品成本约为其两倍,每日成本在0.88美元至1.11美元之间。可素比(每日1.05美元)比单独一瓶每日给药三次或两次的局部用β受体阻滞剂和局部用碳酸酐酶抑制剂成本更低。前列腺素类似物每日成本在0.90美元(瑞新)至1.25美元(适利达)之间。在许多情况下,与更传统的药物相比,新型青光眼药物每日成本相似,尤其是一些仅为品牌的旧产品价格涨幅更大。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验