Fuchs-Buder T, Hofmockel R, Geldner G, Diefenbach C, Ulm K, Blobner M
Département d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universität des Saarlandes.
Anaesthesist. 2003 Jun;52(6):522-6. doi: 10.1007/s00101-003-0508-9.
As there are no reliable epidemiological data for the use of muscle relaxants in Germany,we conducted a mailing study. The aim of the study was to compare the use of muscle relaxants between German anaesthesia departments. In the present part of the presentation we focused on neuromuscular monitoring (NMM) and management of residual paralysis.
A total number of 2,996 questionnaires were sent to all registered anaesthesiological facilities in Germany and the return was 68.6% (2054 questionnaires).
In 574 of the returned questionnaires (28%) the regular use of NMM was confirmed. Intraoperative monitoring of neuromuscular block and assessment of neuromuscular recovery were the most frequent applications of NMM, i.e. 25% and 18% of returned questionnaires, respectively. Clinical signs, however, are still the most popular way to estimate the degree of neuromuscular blockade. Moreover, routine reversal at the end of surgery with a neostigmin/atropine mixture was not practiced in 75% of the anaesthesia departments.
This survey revealed that NMM is still very rarely used in daily clinical practice. Especially the seldom use of NMM to assess residual paralysis has to be improved.
由于德国缺乏使用肌肉松弛剂的可靠流行病学数据,我们开展了一项邮寄调查研究。该研究的目的是比较德国各麻醉科室肌肉松弛剂的使用情况。在本报告的这一部分,我们重点关注神经肌肉监测(NMM)和残余麻痹的管理。
总共向德国所有注册的麻醉机构发送了2996份调查问卷,回收率为68.6%(2054份问卷)。
在回收的问卷中,有574份(28%)确认经常使用NMM。神经肌肉阻滞的术中监测和神经肌肉恢复的评估是NMM最常见的应用,分别占回收问卷的25%和18%。然而,临床体征仍然是估计神经肌肉阻滞程度最常用的方法。此外,75%的麻醉科室在手术结束时不常规使用新斯的明/阿托品混合物进行逆转。
这项调查显示,NMM在日常临床实践中仍然很少使用。特别是很少使用NMM来评估残余麻痹的情况必须得到改善。