Freeman Paul K, Pflug Georg Ch
IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria.
Risk Anal. 2003 Jun;23(3):601-9. doi: 10.1111/1539-6924.00340.
This article examines two possible strategies for financing post-disaster infrastructure rehabilitation in developing and transition countries: relying on ex ante financing instruments (including insurance, catastrophe bonds, and other risk-transfer instruments) and ex post borrowing or credit. Insurance and other ex ante instruments will increase a country's stability, especially if the government authorities have a difficult time borrowing or otherwise raising funds after a major disaster; however, these instruments have an opportunity cost and can reduce the country's economic growth potential. The cost-benefit tradeoff is therefore one between economic growth through infrastructure investment and added solvency and stability for the economy. This article develops a model to illustrate this tradeoff. The model, which views the infrastructure of a developing or transition country as a nondiversifiable portfolio that generates returns, can provide a basis for evaluating alternative financing options depending on the country's objectives in terms of growth, solvency, and stability.
依靠事前融资工具(包括保险、巨灾债券和其他风险转移工具)以及事后借款或信贷。保险和其他事前工具将增强一个国家的稳定性,特别是在重大灾难发生后政府当局难以借款或以其他方式筹集资金的情况下;然而,这些工具存在机会成本,并且可能会降低该国的经济增长潜力。因此,成本效益权衡存在于通过基础设施投资实现的经济增长与经济增加的偿付能力和稳定性之间。本文构建了一个模型来说明这种权衡。该模型将发展中国家或转型国家的基础设施视为一个产生回报的不可分散投资组合,可为根据该国在增长、偿付能力和稳定性方面的目标评估替代融资选项提供基础。